Five hits earn Adam Frazier another crack at Pirates’ leadoff spot |

Five hits earn Adam Frazier another crack at Pirates’ leadoff spot

Chris Adamski
Chistopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates second baseman Adam Frazier celebrates one of his four doubles next to Cubs shortstop Javier Baez on July 1, 2019, at PNC Park.

When Adam Frazier reclaimed the leadoff spot in the Pittsburgh Pirates lineup Monday, it was supposed to be a one-night only engagement.

Having five hits and tying the major-league record for doubles in a game changed that.

“I didn’t ask any analytics,” manager Clint Hurdle said with a wry smile Tuesday. “I didn’t. I’m just gonna kind of own this one, good, bad ugly whatever.”

Frazier opened the season as the Pirates’ leadoff hitter, but through 44 starts with his OPS at an unsightly .655 Hurdle had little choice but to drop the second baseman to the No. 8 spot in the lineup beginning May 30.

Frazier was better there, posting a.787 OPS and .356 on-base percentage (as opposed to .303 as a leadoff hitter). But that wasn’t why he was back in the leadoff spot Monday – it was solely a function of a day of rest for shortstop Kevin Newman, the rookie who’d seized the leadoff role in the interim.

The only other Pirates player to have four doubles in a game before Frazier did on Monday was Paul Waner on May 20, 1932. Frazier’s career-high five hits were the most by a Pirates leadoff hitter since Wally Backman on April 27, 1992.

Frazier’s season OPS is up to .706, the highest it’s been since April 27. His .270 average is as high as it’s been since April 17.

Newman hit in the No. 7 spot in the order for Tuesday’s game against the Chicago Cubs.

Love baseball? Stay up-to-date with the latest Pittsburgh Pirates news.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.