Five matches to watch in the evening session of Day 1 of the NCAA wrestling championships |
Other Local

Five matches to watch in the evening session of Day 1 of the NCAA wrestling championships

Paul Schofield
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt’s Micky Phillippi (left) beats Fresno State’s Gary Joint Thursday, March 21, 2019, during first round of the 2019 NCAA Division I wrestling championship action at PPG Paints Arena.

With the first session in the books at the NCAA Division I wrestling championships, it’s time to look for the best matchups in Thursday’s second session at PPG Paints Arena. There are going to be some good ones, especially at 133 pounds. (Wrestlers’ seeds are designated before their names.)

5-Luke Pletcher, Ohio State (25-5) vs. 12-Montorie Bridges, Wyoming (31-8)

The first 133-pound weight class bouts will feature two returning All-Americans. Pletcher finished fourth at 133 in 2018, and Bridges placed eighth. They did not face each other in the tournament. Pletcher posted a 12-3 win in his opening match Thursday, and Bridges won by a point.

7-Austin DeSanto, Iowa (20-4) vs. 10-Roman Bravo-Young, Penn State (23-4)

DeSanto, the Iowa sophomore who transferred from Drexel, defeated the Penn State freshman 12-8 in the Big Ten semifinals at 133. Bravo-Young split with Pletcher this season, and he was pinned by Iowa State’s Austin Gomez.

13-Austin Gomez, Iowa State (23-5) vs. 4-Micky Phillippi, Pitt (21-2)

Gomez and Phillippi come in with impressive resumes at 133. Gomez pinned Bravo-Young, and Phillippi has defeated No. 1-ranked Daton Fix of Oklahoma State and Pletcher. Phillippi’s losses were to No. 2 Nick Suriano of Rutgers and Virginia Tech’s Korbin Myers.

22-Max Murin, Iowa (17-8) vs. 6-Michael Carr, Illinois (14-5)

Two Pennsylvania wrestlers from the Big Ten Conference are set to meet at 141. The two have split their matches this season. Carr (South Fayette) won the dual 6-3, but Murin (Central Cambria) won the consolation-round match at the Big Ten championships. Murin also won 3-2 in the 2017 Midlands.

26-Ryan Blees, Virginia Tech (18-14) vs. 10-Pat Lugo, Iowa (22-7)

Blees already pulled off an upset in the first session when he defeated Oklahoma State’s Kaden Gfeller. Blees is a former Cowboy. Lugo won a tough battle against Arizona State’s Josh Maruca (Franklin Regional), 5-2, at 149.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.