For Pitt’s Jaylen Twyman, it’s never too early for video work |

For Pitt’s Jaylen Twyman, it’s never too early for video work

Jerry DiPaola
Pitt’s Elias Reynolds celebrates with Jaylen Twyman after Twymana’s sack against Ohio Saturday, Sept. 7, 2019 at Heinz Field.

When Pat Narduzzi walked into Charlie Partridge’s office one day at 6 a.m., he expected to see his defensive line coach already at work.

What surprised him was the fact that Partridge had company.

“I go in to see coach Partridge and I think it’s him behind the computer,” Narduzzi said.


“I see this big guy look up at me, and it’s Jaylen (Twyman) sitting back there,” he said of his sophomore defensive tackle. “He’s worse than (quarterback) Kenny (Pickett, for spending time watching video).

“The guy watches tape a ton. He knows what an offensive lineman is going to do. He has a plan going into a game. He studies the game. He gives himself a chance.”

Twyman is trying to find a little twitch in an offensive lineman’s technique or what the quarterback might do with the football when he senses pressure — anything he might be able to exploit. As a result, he leads the team in tackIes for a loss (five).

Narduzzi included Twyman into an elite group of defensive tackles.

“Like Aaron Donald, there are only a few of those guys out there,” he said. “(Twyman) is better than a guy we had (at Michigan State), Jerel Worthy, who I thought did a great job of knowing what was going on up front.”

Worthy turned out to be a second-round draft choice of the Green Bay Packers.

“This guy (Twyman) is talented and works at it,” Narduzzi said. “He’s not just a guy who likes to go out and play the game. He studies the game. He gives himself a chance.”

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.