ShareThis Page
Former Pitt offensive coordinator Shawn Watson lands in Georgia | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Former Pitt offensive coordinator Shawn Watson lands in Georgia

Jerry DiPaola
732656_web1_gtr-watson02-082418
Pitt offensive coordinator Shawn Watson during practice Aug. 2018 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Shawn Watson, fired as Pitt’s offensive coordinator shortly after the season, has found work with SEC powerhouse Georgia.

He joins the Bulldogs as an offensive quality control analyst, working with new coordinator and quarterbacks coach James Coley, who was promoted after Jim Chaney, another former Pitt coordinator, left for the same job at Tennessee.

“Shawn brings a wealth of knowledge and experience with him after coaching the offensive side of the ball around the country during his career,” Georgia coach Kirby Smart said in a statement. “He is an excellent addition to our staff and we are pleased to have him in Athens already.”

Watson replaces Jay Johnson, who was hired as the offensive coordinator at Colorado.

Watson spent two seasons at Pitt and helped develop junior-to-be Kenny Pickett into a starting quarterback as a freshman in 2017.

He has landed in a place where the team will be expected to win. Georgia was ranked No. 7 in the nation (tied with Florida) in the final Associated Press poll last season. The Bulldogs return junior quarterback Jake Fromm, 80 percent of the offensive line and leading rusher D’Andre Swift.

Watson, 59, has spent the past 33 years as an on-field coach in college.


Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.


Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.