Former Pitt punters Andy Lee, Ryan Winslow become friendly rivals in Arizona | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Former Pitt punters Andy Lee, Ryan Winslow become friendly rivals in Arizona

Jerry DiPaola
1108907_web1_Pittsburgh-Clemson-Football.JPEG-7a1d4
Pitt kicker Chris Blewitt (12) celebrates with teammate Ryan Winslow on Nov. 12, 2016, after kicking the winning field goal against eventual national champion Clemson last season.

The Arizona Cardinals now have two former Pitt punters on their roster – separated by 13 years.

Ryan Winslow, who was Pitt’s punter from 2014-2017, signed with the Cardinals to compete with Lee, 36, who’s been in the NFL since the San Francisco 49ers made him a sixth-round draft choice in 2004.

Winslow was a first-team, All-ACC punter in 2017, averaging 44.5 yards per kick. That was his regular job. But who could forget Winslow completing a pass to linebacker Matt Galambos to help beat Syracuse in 2015? Now word yet on if Winslow also will compete with the Cardinals’ Kyler Murray for the quarterback job.

Winslow also was a reliable holder for placements at Pitt, and he has the distinction of being the first player to congratulate kicker Chris Blewitt, now with the Chicago Bears, after the dramatic, game-winning field goal at Clemson in 2016.

Winslow was with the Bears last summer, but he was released in training camp.

Lee, who’s also been with the Carolina Panthers and Cleveland Browns, averaged 48.6 yards for the Cardinals last season. He pinned 34 percent of his boots inside the 20-yard line.

Lee holds Pitt records for most punts in a season (77) and career (255) and yardage (3,399). All have stood since 2003.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.