ShareThis Page
James Harrison calls Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger ‘good leader’ | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

James Harrison calls Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger ‘good leader’

Chris Adamski
932926_web1_JamesHarrison

James Harrison is coming to the defense of Ben Roethlisberger.

Harrison, the former star linebacker, made the rounds on FS1 shows Monday. He was asked about his former longtime teammate with the Pittsburgh Steelers, Roethlisberger, in the wake of former teammates Antonio Brown and Le’Veon Bell taking shots at Roethlisberger.

“The people that are saying he’s a bad teammate, that’s their truth,” Harrison said on Colin Cowherd’s show. “That’s their understanding as far as their relationship they have with him. For me, I think Ben is a good teammate, and he’s a good leader.”

Harrison acknowledged his view of Roethlisberger differs from that of the current Steelers because Harrison’s tenure with the team predates that of Roethlisberger. Harrison was more of a peer and, it could be argued, was a more important player to the Steelers over the first handful of Roethlisberger’s seasons.

Players who became teammates with Roethlisberger in recent years were seeing a man who is a decade or more their senior, one who was established in the organization and more comfortable with his superiors.

“Them saying he as ‘an owner’s mentality,’ you see him talking to the head coach, the GM, the owners, and a lot of guys are nervous or think that he’s unapproachable,” Harrison said to Cowherd. “I came in, and I was already there, so I met a rookie. I met a different player, so it was easier for me to bond with him.”

Harrison pointed to the support Roethlisberger has gotten from the Steelers offensive linemen. And he suggested if there was a breakdown in the relationship between Roethlisberger and Brown and/or Bell, it was as much their fault as it was the quarterback’s.

Harrison said while the linemen and Roethlisberger routinely meet up away from formal team functions, neither Bell nor Brown formed those bonds with Roethlisberger.

“With AB and Le’Veon, maybe they felt like they should have been closer, or they wanted to be closer,” Harrison said. “If that’s what you wanted, maybe you should have tried to build that relationship.”

Harrison, who also spoke on the FS1 show “Undisputed,” addressed the accusation by former Steelers running back Josh Harris that Roethlisberger fumbled on purpose during a 2014 game because Roethlisberger was unhappy offensive coordinator Todd Haley called a running play.

Harrison said “I don’t see that,” and added the play in question wasn’t even discussed in the locker room or among players after it happened.

“I don’t even remember it,” Harrison told Cowherd.

Injured Steelers linebacker Ryan Shazier publicly endorsed Harrison’s thoughts, saying in a tweet from his verified account that quoted a video clip of Harrison’s “Undisputed” segment: “Bro you couldn’t have said it better bro,” followed by four “prayer” emojis.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.