Former Steelers WR Martavis Bryant to apply for NFL reinstatement, per ESPN |

Former Steelers WR Martavis Bryant to apply for NFL reinstatement, per ESPN

Chris Adamski
Oakland Raiders wide receiver Martavis Bryant, right, has been suspended by the NFL for reportedly violating the terms of his April 2017 conditional reinstatement under the Policy and Program for Substances of Abuse.

He’s still relatively young, and he remains a big-play threat. But will Martavis Bryant get the opportunity to continue his NFL career?

The talented but mercurial former Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver plans to apply for reinstatement into the NFL, according to ESPN’s Dan Graziano. Bryant is under an indefinite suspension for violating the terms of his conditional reinstatement from a previous ban.

While with the Steelers, Bryant was twice suspended – including for the entire 2016 season – for violating the league’s substance abuse policy.

A fourth-round pick of the Steelers in 2014, Bryant had nine touchdowns (including playoffs) in 11 games. He had 17 touchdowns in his first 24 NFL games counting the postseason before his season-long banishment.

The Steelers traded him to the Oakland Raiders during the 2018 draft, getting back a third-round pick. Bryant was released and later re-signed by the Raiders during the season.

The NFL announced his indefinite suspension in December.

According to Graziano, the basis of Bryant’s case appears to be that the NFL’s “drug program is not set up to offer players access to proper treatment for mental health issues.”

Bryant had only 19 catches last season, but he averaged 14.0 yards per reception.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.