Four Downs: Steelers’ Mike Hilton is outstanding vs. run, mediocre against pass | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Four Downs: Steelers’ Mike Hilton is outstanding vs. run, mediocre against pass

Chris Adamski
1734357_web1_AP_19252549406216
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers cornerback Mike Hilton tackles New England Patriots wide receiver Julian Edelman in the second half of the season opener Sept. 8.

1. Slot machines

Mike Hilton has ceded some of the Pittsburgh Steelers slot-cornerback duties to Cameron Sutton this season. As PennLive.com broke down well, the division of labor in the splitting of snaps is based largely around deploying Hilton against the run and Sutton in passing-heavy situations.

Looking at some of the Pro Football Focus data regarding Hilton, that makes sense.

Per PFF, Hilton is allowing a perfect 158.3 passer rating in eight passes thrown to his coverage. Among 102 qualifying cornerbacks, Hilton is 89th in yards per coverage snap (1.93) and 80th in coverage snaps per reception (7.7). Among 54 qualifying defensive backs in slot coverage, Hilton ranks 51st and 45th in those categories. It was much the same, according to PFF, last season: Hilton was 107th in coverage snaps per reception and 86th in yards per coverage snap.

However, the 5-foot-8 Hilton is outstanding against the run: his 7.0% run-stop percentage led NFL cornerbacks last season. He’s fourth in the league this season at 8.3%. Hilton did not have a missed tackle in the running game throughout the past two seasons.

2. No coming for Conner

During the 2018 season opener in his first game as an NFL featured back, James Conner had 135 rushing yards and 192 yards from scrimmage. That’s more than he has in each category right now through three weeks of his second season as the Steelers’ starting running back.

Worse, the blame isn’t because opponents (other than the Seahawks) are gearing up to stop him. Far from it. Of Conner’s 23 combined carries in the Week 1 and Week 3 losses to New England and San Francisco, during only one did the defense have “eight men in the box,” according to NFL Next Gen Stats. And Conner gained 64 yards against those teams (2.8 average).

Also of note: Conner has one carry of longer than 10 yards this season and none of longer than 14 yards. Last season through three weeks, Conner had six carries of at least 10 yards, and he finished the season with nine carries of at least 20 yards.

3. Not good

Donte Moncrief was signed in March to a $9 million contract, and he began the regular season as a major part of the offensive gameplan (no skill-position player played more snaps in the opener). By Week 3, though, he was a healthy scratch.

Looking at some of the objective advanced stats and subjective ratings from the analytics community, it’s easy to see why. Across multiple platforms and using differing criteria, Moncrief rates as the worse receivers in the NFL:

Moncrief is last in yards per route run (0.13, per PFF), last in yards after catch for anyone with at least three catches or at least 11 targets (3, per airyards.com), last in yards per targeted throw (0.6) of any player with more than one reception and last in yards per catch among any wide receiver (2.3). Using more advanced statistics (the NFL’s Next Gen), Moncrief has gotten the least average separation of any eligible NFL receiver this season (1.5 yards between him and the nearest defender at the time of catch or incompletion).

Those are the raw numbers. Moncrief is rated 108th out of 108 eligible receivers in PFF’s wide receiver ratings. He was 126th out of 126 in footballoutsiders.com’s Defense-adjusted Yards Above Replacement metric.

4. Still the one

With three touchdowns — two of 55 yards or more — through three weeks this season, the Cincinnati Bengals’ John Ross finally is providing return on the draft investment made in him. The speedster was No. 9 overall pick of a 2017 draft that had three receivers each go in the first and second rounds. Of those, JuJu Smith-Schuster, the youngest and last taken of that group (No. 62 overall), has by far the most receptions (183). Ross still has the fewest with 34. Smith-Schuster has more than twice as many receptions as all but one of the other five, and Ross has almost half as many of any of the other five.

Career catches for the others: Tennessee’s Corey Davis 105, Buffalo’s Zay Jones 88, Carolina’s Curtis Samuel 67, the Los Angeles Chargers’ Mike Williams 62. Davis and Williams were taken among the top seven picks. Jones and Samuel went early in the second round.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.