Four Downs: Steelers prepare for improvisational Seahawks QB Russell Wilson | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Four Downs: Steelers prepare for improvisational Seahawks QB Russell Wilson

Chris Adamski
1675621_web1_gtr-russell-041719
AP
Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson runs out of the pocket against the Dallas Cowboys during the first half of the NFC wild-card playoff game last season.

1. Patient Wilson

A week after facing the quick-decision, get-the-ball-out-quickly Tom Brady, the Pittsburgh Steelers defense faces an entirely different style in the Seattle Seahawks’ Russell Wilson. Wilson had the third-longest average time to throw (3.02 seconds) among qualifying quarterbacks last season, according to the NFL’s Next Gen Stats platform. That continued in Week 1 of this season, when just three league quarterbacks held on to the ball longer, on average.

This, of course, can be a challenge for defensive backs, who must hold coverage longer. But as some Steelers pointed out this week, it also can be a benefit to passrushers, who will have more opportunities for sacks and pressures (only two quarterbacks were sacked more often in 2018 than Wilson).

What could be most alarming, though, for the Steelers defense is that few are better than Wilson at improvising and/or waiting for his receivers’ routes to develop: according to Pro Football Focus, no passer in the NFL had a better rating (119.7) when they attempted throws more than 2.5 seconds after the snap. Only Patrick Mahomes threw more touchdown passes than Wilson (20) in such situations last season.

2. Almost Zero-point-zero

Donte Moncrief called Sunday “my worst game ever.” While that’s subjective, what isn’t is that Moncrief was – by one telling statistic, at least – the worst receiver in the NFL during Week 1.

Moncrief averaged 0.16 yards per route run during the loss to New England, according to Pro Football Focus. That ranked dead last among 74 qualifying wide receivers during the NFL’s opening weekend. For context as to how poor that is, the median yards per route run for qualifying wide receivers last season was 1.58 – TEN TIMES as much as Moncrief posted in 44 routes run Sunday. Including running backs and tight ends, 129 players were targeted with attempted passes at least four times in Week 1; not one averaged fewer yards per route run than Moncrief.

As an interesting aside, only nine players among the 30 teams that played four quarters in Week 1 were sent out on more routes than Moncrief (44). Moncrief led all Steelers in routes run – topping even No. 1 WR JuJu Smith-Schuster.

3. Slot machines

Only 30 players across the NFL were targeted for three or more passes more while running out of the slot in Week 1; three of them were Steelers. It was a show of the diversity of looks that offensive coordinator Randy Fichtner wants to show, as well as a compliment to the versatility of the Steelers wide receivers. Even counting tight ends, just 25 players in the league ran at least 22 routes out of the slot; that group includes Smith-Schuster (29), Ryan Switzer (29) and Moncrief (22).

4. Fool’s back

Considering he didn’t even play a snap on offense in the opener, way too much has been made about the injury to Roosevelt Nix in regards to whom will fill the role of fullback. The short answer is “nobody,” because the Steelers rarely use one and, more germane, will be even less inclined to use one with Nix unavailable.

In the past, the Steelers have often had a David Johnson-type in their tight end corps, a player with familiarity at playing fullback. Currently, though, their three-man TE group on the 53-man roster includes a player they won’t put in harm’s way (injury-prone, $5.8 million cap hit) in starter Vance McDonald and a tall and lean pass-catcher in rookie Zach Gentry.

That leaves only Xavier Grimble as a viable fullback candidate among the tight ends. Grimble said that he wasn’t taking practice reps there this week, but “If you play tight end for the Steelers part of what you do is a fullback. It’s always something we’ve done.”

Grimble assured he would be ready if needed, but he didn’t sound as if he expected that to be the case: “There’s a reason we only keep one (fullback on the roster).”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.