ShareThis Page
Fourth-liner Aston-Reese ready to build on return from hand injury |

Fourth-liner Aston-Reese ready to build on return from hand injury

Joe Rutter
Florida Panthers’ Colton Sceviour (7) and Pittsburgh Penguins’ Zach Aston-Reese (46) fight during the third period of an NHL hockey game, Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2019, in Pittsburgh. Both players were penalized. The Penguins won 5-1. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

With his first game in over a month out of the way, Zach Aston-Reese is looking to increase his hockey conditioning for the Pittsburgh Penguins.

Skating on a fourth line Wednesday night in a 3-1 victory against the Edmonton Oilers, Aston-Reese played in his first game since Jan. 8 when he suffered a hand injury in a fight.

The Penguins have games on consecutive days this weekend against Calgary and the New York Rangers.

Aston-Reese played 10 minutes, 53 seconds against Edmonton. He had five hits and was a plus-one. He admitted it took a while to get going after sitting out 13 games.

“It’s always a little bit difficult to stay in game shape no matter what you do (while you’re out),” he said Thursday after practice. “You’re kind of using your whole body, not just your legs or your upper body. You’re recreating a scenario where you read and react. That’s the toughest thing to do. You just have to play games.”

Aston-Reese joined Matt Cullen and Garrett Wilson on a fourth line that, at times, found itself matched up against Edmonton’s top line that include Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl. The fourth-liners held the McDavid line in check during 4:03 of ice time.

“I thought as a line, we played pretty well,” Aston-Reese said. “It felt good that coach trusted us to get the job done.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.