Franklin Regional grad Palmer Jackson helps Notre Dame to another victory |
Other Local

Franklin Regional grad Palmer Jackson helps Notre Dame to another victory

Paul Schofield

Notre Dame freshman Palmer Jackson continued his hot summer with a fourth-place finish at the Windon Memorial championship in Chicago.

The Franklin Regional grad and Murrysville native’s 4-under par 209 helped the Fighting Irish to their second-consecutive tournament title. Notre Dame finished at 10-under, defeating 13 other teams, including six from Power 5 conferences.

It’s the first time Notre Dame has won back-to-back tournaments featuring fields of 10 or more teams since the 1999-2000 season, and just the second time in program history.

“One win in college golf is hard to come by, but to get two and to get them back to back is special,” Notre Dame coach John Handrigan said in a release. “After winning last week, we challenged each other not to get complacent, but to stay motivated and to stick to our goals. I would say this team definitely answered the challenge.”

Senior Hunter Ostrom earned his second consecutive runner-up finish. Ostrom finished with a 5-under par 208 after carding an even-par 71 in the final round on Tuesday.

Jackson shot a 2-under par 69 during the final round.

“Palmer has made a huge impact early in his career for our program,” Handrigan said. “A top-five finish in an elite field is outstanding. He’s a pleasure to coach.”

Notre Dame won the Badger Invitational on Sept. 8 and 9. The Irish play in Toledo on Monday and Tuesday.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.