ShareThis Page
Gamblers bet on new football league despite no history | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Gamblers bet on new football league despite no history

Wayne Parry • Associated Press
| Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:15 p.m
746885_web1_AP19044710679324
Atlanta Legends receiver Bug Howard (84) is tackled by Orlando Apollos safety Will Hill and defensive back Keith Reaser (29) after catching a pass during the first half of an Alliance of American Football game, in Orlando.

ATLANTIC CITY — Almost no one knows the players and there’s virtually no history to look back on.

But that’s not stopping gamblers from making — and bookmakers from taking — bets on America’s newest professional football league, the Alliance of American Football (AAF).

With one weekend of games under its belt, the league has already drawn interest from some bettors — not nearly the action of a typical NFL game but enough to encourage sportsbooks that the fledgling league’s games are worth offering on a betting menu.

While no bookmaker would reveal precisely how much was bet on last weekend’s inaugural slate of games, many said they were encouraged.

“It was more than I expected,” said Joe Asher, CEO of William Hill US, which operates books in Nevada, New Jersey and several other states. “Tiny in comparison to the NFL, but not bad considering it’s a brand new league.”

Las Vegas sportsbooks also reported mild interest. Jay Kornegay, vice president of race and sportsbook operations at the Westgate Las Vegas Superbook, said AAF games drew bets at about the same rate as an average college basketball game.

“It was light in football terms, but understandably so,” he said. “Some books had pretty robust action, comparable to an NBA game, while at others, it trickled in.”

Jay Rood, vice president of race and sports for MGM Resorts International was pleased with what he described as “fairly light” wagering that nonetheless was three times what the company expected to see. He said the AAF’s weekend handle exceeded the level of betting on a typical WNBA game, approaching the level of betting on a lower-tier college football game.

One obvious challenge: How to set betting lines — or any expectations — from a league with no past results aside from an exhibition game. Many outlets limited bets on the infant league to $500 to $1,000.

“It’s a challenge, for both bookmakers and sports bettors, when there is no history on the teams and very little history on most of the players involved,” said Mattias Stetz, chief operating officer of Rush Street Interactive, which operates the sportsbooks at two Pennsylvania casinos.

“The handle was relatively small to start, but we expect it to pick up as players get more familiar with the league,” Stetz said. “TV ratings were surprisingly high for the AAF this weekend, and betting handle tends to follow public interest, so we are excited to see where things go from here.”

Rood said the league invited sportsbooks to watch a preseason game and review training camp scrimmages to familiarize themselves with the teams. He said 60 percent to 70 percent of bets came from sophisticated gamblers, or “sharps” looking to profit from a situation in which nobody knows much about the league.

William Hill’s lines on the initial AAF games were “not as tight, but our guys do their best,” Asher said.

League officials did not respond to a message seeking comment from The Associated Press.

The league’s debut the weekend after the Super Bowl gave some football fans something else to bet on with the NFL wrapped up. Ivan Mitef of Kansas City bet $200 on each of the AAF’s first four games, winning three of them by betting the under on the total points scored in each game.

But he said he was less sure than usual about these bets, placed with an offshore internet site.

“I wasn’t too comfy on some of the spreads just yet; I wanted to see them play a game,” he said. “I figured new league, some of the teams might not have jived yet, so I thought it was a good idea to take all the unders.”

Others remained wary of risking cash on a brand-new league.

“It’s too early to make a bet on them,” said Jerry Brown, a sports bettor from Columbus, Ohio. “It’ll probably have to be a few games in to see how teams play for me to feel comfortable.”

The league’s regular season is scheduled for 10 weeks, plus two weeks of playoffs including a title game on April 27.

Westgate has the Arizona Hotshots and the Orlando Apollos as the co-favorites to win the AAF championship at 2-1; the San Antonio Commanders and the Birmingham Iron at 6-1; the Salt Lake Stallions at 8-1; the San Diego Fleet at 12-1, and the Memphis Express and the Atlanta Legends at 40-1.

MGM also has Arizona and Orlando as its top favorites to win the title.

Rood predicts the league will be popular among football fans and bettors in part because of games being televised on NFL Network or CBS Sports Network.

“People want to bet on what they can watch,” he said. “I don’t really think it’s going to threaten college football or the NFL anytime soon, but for a new spring league, it’s got some legs under it.”

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.