ShareThis Page
Georgia sprinter impaled by javelin, full recovery expected | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Georgia sprinter impaled by javelin, full recovery expected

1132847_web1_web-Track

ATHENS, Ga. — A Georgia track athlete was expected to make a full recovery after being impaled by a javelin during practice.

Freshman sprinter Elija Godwin was injured Tuesday when he and his fellow sprinters were doing backward sprints at the university’s track. According to school statement, Godwin backed into a javelin that was implanted in the ground, causing the rear part of the spear to pierce his back.

A report from campus police said Godwin suffered a punctured and collapsed left lung. Rescue workers were able to cut off part of the javelin, and the rest was removed during surgery at Piedmont Athens Regional Medical Center.

“It was truly an accident,” Georgia athletic director Greg McGarity said. “Nobody threw anything or anything like that.”

Godwin was in stable condition Wednesday but will miss the remainder of the track season.

The police report said Godwin “suffered a javelin wound to the middle of his back and just below the shoulder blade.” He was backpedaling quickly when he struck a javelin that had been “left on the ground at an angle,” which resulted in “a large amount of blood in the grass.”

“We would like to express appreciation for all those who acted so quickly and efficiently in coming to the aid of Elija,” said Ron Courson, the school’s director of sports medicine.

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.