Giants minor leaguer Tyler Cyr tweets meager paycheck |

Giants minor leaguer Tyler Cyr tweets meager paycheck


Tyler Cyr is making a name for himself. The San Francisco Giants minor league relief pitcher has climbed the organizational ladder, from rookie ball in 2015 to Triple-A Sacramento — one rung below the major leagues — this past season.

What he is not making: money.

In an attempt to shine a light on the plight of minor league baseball prospects, Cyr took to Twitter on Monday to share his paycheck. Which took some courage.

Cyr’s contract was worth $10,275. His net pay was $8,216.58.

During his minor league career, Cyr has a 12-10 record with 29 saves and a 2.76 ERA.

The downside? He tweeted that since being drafted (in the 10th round in 2015) he has paid to play baseball — $94 in 2016; $112; 2017; $1,250 in 2018; and $487.64 in 2019.

He must love the game, even when the game doesn’t love him back. Because it appears he has options. According to, Cyr has attended Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida. According to the school’s website, Embry-Riddle is the world’s largest, fully accredited university specializing in aviation and aerospace. Again, referring to the school’s website, Embry-Riddle offers a degree in aerospace engineering.

Want to know how much an aerospace engineer makes? According to Glassdoor, between $88,700 and $134,000 in San Jose.

It appears Cyr decided to raise awareness of minor league poverty when minor league pitcher Randy Dobnak, who Cyr says had to drive for Uber during spring training, was promoted to the Minnesota Twins major league roster and pitched against the New York Yankees in the ALDS.

Categories: Sports | MLB
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.