Guaranteed spots in Indy 500 divides owners |
U.S./World Sports

Guaranteed spots in Indy 500 divides owners

Associated Press
Josef Newgarden pulls out of the pits during practice for the Indianapolis 500 IndyCar auto race at Indianapolis Motor Speedway, Friday, May 17, 2019 in Indianapolis.

INDIANAPOLIS — Bobby Rahal remembers watching the start of the Indianapolis 500 from a suite with his sponsors after he failed to make the 1993 field.

He was bitter to miss “The Greatest Spectacle in Racing,” but understood the sanctity of only the fastest 33 racing at Indianapolis Motor Speedway.

“As a driver, I’ll never forget sitting up in our suite, watching the pace lap, all our sponsors there, (thinking) ‘I belong here, not up there,’ ” Rahal said Friday. “It was an emotional time. You make the best of it and go on.”

Rahal falls firmly on the side of tradition in that 33 drivers qualify on pure speed for the Indy 500. He’s against guarantees for teams racing full-time in the IndyCar Series because Rahal so passionately subscribes to the purest form of the race.

But opinions are split with 36 drivers vying for 33 positions in the two-day qualifying format that begins Saturday. There were 35 drivers last year and series regular James Hinchcliffe, a popular championship contender, was one of two not to make the field.

It could have been crippling to Hinchcliffe’s race team, which leaned heavily on sponsor Arrow for activation and support. Roger Penske is among those who believe sponsor relationships should have protection. Penske this year is marking his 50th anniversary at Indianapolis.

Penske missed the 1995 race with both of his cars, but Team Penske has a record 17 victories and won last year’s race with Will Power.

“I think in today’s world, under the current situation, if you’re going to commit and run the whole season, you should have an opportunity to run in this race,” Penske said Friday. “At the present time, that would be my position.”

Penske supports guarantees for the 20-something cars that run all 17 of the IndyCar races, even if it’s a slap at tradition. The race is worth double points, too, and missing it last year hurt Hinchcliffe’s championship effort.

“There’s a lot of traditions that change here, right? They have a road race here, a Formula 1 race, a NASCAR race here,” Penske said. “To me, it’s a sign of the times.”

Chip Ganassi is split on the argument. He prefers the tradition but doesn’t like this year’s format. A year ago, Hinchcliffe and Pippa Mann were eliminated at the end of the first day of qualifying. To ensure teams a second chance, IndyCar this year said the fastest 30 are locked into the race Saturday and the remaining entrants will have one chance to post a qualifying attempt for the final three positions.

Ganassi argues all six of the Sunday cars could go faster than some in the first 30, but three still won’t qualify. To him, that’s not truly the fastest 33.

“Here is a scenario where it won’t be the fastest 33, and I just think that’s not right,” Ganassi said. “I think it’s one or the other. If you don’t have the fastest 33, then I think you should have guaranteed spots. If you do the fastest 33, you don’t need that.

“I never said 25 and 8 or anything like that. It’s just the way I feel. If it’s not the fastest 33, then the full-season participants should have some guarantee. If it’s the fastest 33, then I’m fine with that.”

Rahal also uses Hinchcliffe’s miss last season as proof a team can miss the Indianapolis 500 and survive. Arrow remained with Schmidt-Peterson Motorsports after missing the 500 and deepened its investment during the offseason buy purchasing an ownership stake with the team.

“Roger didn’t lose his sponsors when he didn’t qualify in ‘95, right?” Rahal said. “I mean, I didn’t qualify in ‘93. I got a three-year extension from Miller Brewing Company. Last year with Arrow, Arrow didn’t walk away. In fact, they expanded their involvement with Schmidt.

“You know, I don’t know of any of our sponsors thinks everything is a guaranteed, it’s a given. I think they understand. If they were true partners with the teams they’re with, that would walk away if you had an issue in qualifying, I think most would say, ‘How do we make sure this doesn’t happen again?’”

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.