‘He has to answer for that’ – Steelers shocked by helmet swing of Browns’ Myles Garrett | TribLIVE.com

‘He has to answer for that’ – Steelers shocked by helmet swing of Browns’ Myles Garrett

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Brown’s Myles Garrett rips off the helmet of Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph in the fourth quarter Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019 at FirstEnergy Stadium.

CLEVELAND — There was anger, there was a sense of standing up for a teammate, and there even was an air of pending restitution. But perhaps the most prominent feeling of all in the Pittsburgh Steelers locker room about a half hour after Myles Garrett’s helmet swing at Mason Rudolph was one of shock.

“I have never seen anything like that,” cornerback Joe Haden said, “especially when a player doesn’t have a helmet on — and it’s your quarterback.”

Rudolph said he hadn’t seen an on-field incident like that in his football career, either. Rudolph called it “cowardly and bush league.”

Teammate Mark Barron used another word.

“Bull——,” the Steelers linebacker said. “And I’ll just leave it at that. Bull——. I’ll just leave it exactly like that, because that’s exactly what it was. Not much else to be said about that.”

Coach Mike Tomlin chose exactly that route — not saying anything.

“I’ll keep my thoughts to myself,” Tomlin said.

“I have no comment,” he added after a follow-up.

When a reporter tried a third inquiry, Tomlin had enough.

“No more questions regarding that because I am saying nothing.”

Not all of Tomlin’s players, though, bit their tongues.

“For someone to use a helmet as a weapon is uncalled for,” Steelers defensive captain Cameron Heyward said.

“I don’t know how he got to the point that it’s OK to use a helmet as a weapon.”

Haden was a teammate of Garrett’s for about four months in 2017 after Garrett was drafted No. 1 overall and before the Browns released Haden in late August of that year. Haden called Garrett “ a good dude” and remarked how emotional a win against the Steelers is for the Browns, who were winless in their past nine against their Turnpike rivals.

But Haden still was incredulous at Garrett’s actions.

“That’s not OK,” Haden said.

The Steelers generally took the politically correct route in regards to calling for what will almost certainly be a suspension levied on Garrett by the NFL.

“I will let the commissioner choose (discipline),” Haden said. “It’s not my job I don’t know, but something (needs done). We all talk about player safety, and that was… that was… that was crazy.”

The Steelers might also be without a Pro Bowl-level player as a result of the incident. Triggered by Garrett’s helmet swing, center Maurkice Pouncey lunged toward Garrett, swung his fist at him multiple times and even kicked toward Garrett as Garrett lied on the ground.

“At this point, who cares?” Pouncey said of any league discipline. “My man got hit in the head with a helmet. I’ll accept whatever penalty it is.

“At this point it’s bigger than football.”

Guard David DeCastro was arguably more central to the whole sequence than anyone else; he took on something of a peacekeeping role between Garrett, Rudolph, Pouncey and Browns defensive tackle Larry Ogunjobi, the latter of whom shoved Rudolph to the ground as the melee was escalating.

Rudolph acknowledged his role in the altercation, saying he “felt like I had a bone to pick with him after what he did.”

On whole, though, the Steelers recognized that above all other actions during the sequence, Garrett’s swing of Rudolph’s helmet at Rudolph’s bare head was the most inexcusable and the one above all that the NFL needs to levy discipline for.

“That’s just reckless,” DeCastro said of Garrett’s swing. “The whole nation will be watching to see how (the NFL) handles it.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.