Hempfield East Legion falls in regional opener | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Hempfield East Legion falls in regional opener

Paul Schofield
1511587_web1_web-Baseballstock2

Lyon County scored three runs in the first inning Wednesday morning and held on to defeat Hempfield East, 5-2, in the American Legion Great Lakes Regional in Charleston, Ill.

Hempfield East will face Pennsylvania state champion Swoyersville at 8:30 a.m. Thursday. Swoyersville defeated Hempfield East twice in the state tournament last month.

Matt Wicker gave Hempfield East a 1-0 lead in the top of the first inning when he doubled home Hunter Eperesi, who singled.

But Hempfield East could get a clutch hit after the first inning.

“We stranded eight runners and didn’t get the timely hit,” Hempfield East coach Scott Smith said. “We beat ourselves with a couple miscues.”

Lyon County, the Kentucky state champion, scored three times off losing pitcher Andrew Rosenberg in the bottom of the first inning and added two more off Wicker in the fifth.

“I feel we’re the better team, but they had a couple good pitchers,” Smith said. “I felt we pitched well enough to win.”

Hempfield East did threaten in the top of the seventh inning on back-to-back hits by Reid Amundson and Dajauhn Hertzog to start the inning. But Amundson was the only runner to score on a ground out by Eperesi.

Cameron Dean had two hits and two RBIs for Lyon County, while Gabe Board and Davis Corbett added two hits.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.