Hempfield East Legion comes up short in Great Lakes Regional | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Hempfield East Legion comes up short in Great Lakes Regional

Paul Schofield

Swoyersville has Hempfield East’s number this season.

For the third time in two weeks, Swoyersville beat the District 31 and Region 7 champions, this time 4-1 on Thursday in the American Legion Great Lakes Regional at Eastern Illinois in Charleston, Ill.

The loss ended Hempfield East’s season. Swoyersville was the only team to defeat Hempfield East in the Pennsylvania state tournament.

“It was a wonderful experience for the players, something they’ll remember for a lifetime,” Hempfield East coach Scott Smith said. “They’ve gone has far as any travel team and loved the entire experience.”

Top Sports Videos

Swoyersville got a one-hit performance from winning pitcher Tommy Federici and three hits from leadoff hitter Garret Vought.

Hempfield East grabbed a 1-0 lead in the top of the first inning when Andrew Rosenberg, who walked, scored on a sacrifice fly by Matt Wicker.

Swoyersville tied the score 1-1 in the bottom of the first on a sacrifice fly by Tyler O’Kane to scored Vought.

The winning run came in the second inning on a balk.

Hempfield East’s only hit was by Rosenberg with two outs in the fifth inning.

Swoyersville got two insurance runs in the bottom of the sixth inning.

Lance Daley suffered the loss despite allowing only two hits.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.