How Antonio Brown is turning helmet saga into another payday |

How Antonio Brown is turning helmet saga into another payday

Oakland Raiders wide receiver Antonio Brown has yet to play a preseason snap this season.

Oh to be Antonio Brown. Even when he loses, he wins.

Sure, the Oakland Raiders wide receiver and former Pittsburgh Steelers star lost his second and final appeal to the NFL and the players’ union to wear his now-banned favorite helmet, but he’s going to profit handsomely because of it.

His agent, Drew Rosenhaus, said Sunday that Brown is negotiating with “multiple helmet companies” that will not only custom design his new helmet but will also offer him a lucrative endorsement deal.

What’s that old saying about the squeaky wheel getting the grease payment?

Brown lost his grievance late last week in a final bid to continue wearing the Schutt Air Advantage helmet, one of the brands the NFL deemed wasn’t up to its new safety standards because the model is more than 10 years old.

“We’re gonna move on. That door is closed,” Rosenhaus said on SiriusXM NFL radio Sunday. “On the bright side, as a result of all the publicity (surrounding his helmet saga), he has multiple offers on the table right now.

“Without getting into specifics, we’ve found some very suitable alternatives so Antonio will be wearing an approved helmet. He won’t be missing any time, and he’ll be getting paid a lot of money to do so,” Rosenhaus said. “So it’s sort of a happy ending even though he won’t be able to wear the old helmet any more. “

To recap, Brown walked out of camp twice because he was upset with the league and his union for making him change to a new helmet he wasn’t comfortable wearing. Partly because of that, the man who signed a three-year, $50 million contract with the Raiders hasn’t played a snap in any of their three preseason games.

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.