ShareThis Page
Other High School Sports

Susalla claims boys varsity title at Gateway Invitational

Michael Love
| Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2014, 6:15 p.m.
Jake Susalla comes down the home stretch to a winning finish in the boys varsity race at the season-opening Gateway Invitational at Boyce Park on Aug. 30, 2014.
Michael Love | Trib Total Media
Jake Susalla comes down the home stretch to a winning finish in the boys varsity race at the season-opening Gateway Invitational at Boyce Park on Aug. 30, 2014.

Jake Susalla finished third at last year's season-opening Gateway Invitiational, placing just behind the dominant duo of Fox Chapel's Ethan and Colin Martin.

On Saturday, the Plum junior had a goal of taking first in his return to the challenging Boyce Park course with its hilly features.

When it was all said and done, Susalla was wearing gold with a first-place time of 17 minutes, 28 seconds.

He is the first Plum champion of the boys varsity race in the close to three decades of the Gateway Invitational, said Plum head coach Joe Ionta.

“That was truly a great feat. We want to make sure we are careful with him because of his past injury problems, but he ran really well and very smart,” Ionta said.

“We're looking for some great things from him this year if he continues to run healthy. I think he is one of the top runners in the WPIAL right now.”

Susalla outdistanced Baldwin's Casey Conboy by 14 seconds, and West Allegheny's Zack White placed third, 22 seconds behind Susalla.

On the girls side, junior Rachel Valotta edged out a pair of Bethel Park runners for fifth place.

Fifth was decided by tenths of a second, and Valotta came in with a time of 21:59.2, while Bethel Park's Karissa Coffield was sixth in 21:59.7.

Coffield's teammate, Dani Hinish, placed seventh (21:59.9).

Valotta's time was a minute better than her finish last year as a sophomore.

“Rachel did very well,” Ionta said.

“She has really moved to the next level this year. (Fifth place) is an outstanding accomplishment considering all of the strong runners who were in the race with her.”

The Plum boys finished eighth in the team standings, and John Raggiunti was the next Mustangs finisher behind Susalla with a 26th place in a time of 19:41.

“Gateway's course is very challenging, one of the most challenging they will run all season,” Ionta said.

Freshman Chris Izydore capped a Plum sweep of the boys varsity and JV races as he finished the JV event first with a time of 20:36.

His time would've placed him as the third Plum runner in the varsity race and 38th overall.

Izydore, Ionta said, split time between soccer and cross country in junior high but now is concentrating on running.

“We think he can break out and have a great season with more experience,” Ionta said.

“To have two individual winners out of four races is very special.”

Plum's next four girls varsity runners after Valotta each placed in the top 50. Josie Diclaudio was 30th (24:23), and Maddie Biertempfel (35th), Kayla Anderson (39th) and Claire Klippel (46) all contributed to the varsity fourth-place team score.

“The teams can be happy with their accomplishments, but they can't be satisfied,” Ionta said.

“It was a really nice opening meet to help us see where we are and what we can work on. Our goal is to always run well as a team. The team effort was great on both parts, and we need to use that to our advantage.”

The Plum teams were slated to host Avella and Penn-Trafford on Tuesday at their home course in Boyce Park. The meet was to be run past the deadline for this week's edition.

The Mustangs are preparing for the Section 4 championship meet on Sept. 30 with a dual meet against Woodland Hills next Wednesday at Boyce Park and the Uniontown Invitational at Penn State-Fayette's Campus on Sept. 27.�

Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5825, at mlove@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Mlove_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me