ShareThis Page
Other High School Sports

A-K Valley roundup: Plum routs Burrell in girls soccer opener

| Saturday, Sept. 5, 2015, 10:51 p.m.

Plum not only opened the girls soccer season on a grand stage, but it did so with a victory.

Ashley Amato scored four goals and Nicolette Casarcia added two as Plum blanked Burrell, 6-0, in the nonsection opener for both teams Saturday morning at Highmark Stadium.

Shady Side Academy 4, Apollo-Ridge 1 — Brianna Murray scored the lone goal for Apollo-Ridge, which played its first game as an official WPIAL team. Megan Bonelli and Morgan Ashbaugh shared time in goal for the Lady Vikings in the Section 4-A loss.

Boys soccer

Freeport 4, Armstrong 2 — Mario Borino scored a hat trick, and Tanner Hoscheid chipped in a goal as Freeport (1-0) downed newcomer Armstrong (0-1) in a nonsection game.

Fox Chapel 6, Deer Lakes 1 — Michael Snowball and Carson Cohen scored a pair of goals apiece to lead Fox Chapel (1-0) past Deer Lakes (0-1) in a nonsection matchup. Jacob Miller and Ryan Santilli also scored for the Foxes.

North Allegheny 6, Kiski Area 1 — Nick Bono scored the only goal for Kiski Area (0-1) in a nonsection loss to North Allegheny (1-0).

Girls volleyball

Armstrong wins tournament — In an auspicious debut, Armstrong won the Northern Cambria tournament as the River Hawks defeated Somerset in the finals, 25-19.

Cross country

Gateway Invitational — The Fox Chapel boys and Riverview girls posted second-place finishes in the team standings and had three individual runners finish in the top 10. Riverview's Molly Kennedy finished fourth, Jenna Joseph eighth and Meredith Kocur ninth. Fox Chapel's Brendan Urso was fourth, while John Folkerts finished ninth and Adam Cook 10th.

Plum's Rachel Valotta was the girls' runner-up, while Deer Lakes' Alex Herman took sixth individually.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me