ShareThis Page
Boys Soccer

Penn-Trafford boys soccer opens WPIAL playoffs with win over Bethel Park

| Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2016, 1:42 p.m.
Penn-Trafford's Trevor Momeyer (4) breaks away from Franklin Regional's Domenick DiFalco during their WPIAL boys soccer match Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2016, in Harrison City. Penn-Trafford defeated Franklin Regional, 3-0.
Barry Reeger | For The Tribune-Review
Penn-Trafford's Trevor Momeyer (4) breaks away from Franklin Regional's Domenick DiFalco during their WPIAL boys soccer match Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2016, in Harrison City. Penn-Trafford defeated Franklin Regional, 3-0.

The Penn-Trafford boys soccer team isn't sleeping on anyone.

A season after winning 14 games in the regular season but falling in the WPIAL quarterfinals, the Warriors entered the postseason with a new focus.

Penn-Trafford started its trek to a WPIAL title with a 5-0 shellacking of Bethel Park in the opening round of the Class AAAA playoffs Saturday.

“Most of these guys went through last season,” Penn-Trafford coach Rick Nese said. “They understand it is a different season and a different type of game. We talked at halftime about how every 40 minutes tells a different story in the playoffs.

“You can come out flat in the first half and take it to a team in the second. You can play well in a half and be on your heels in the second. Every half is 40-minute game.”

It did not take long for the Warriors to impose their will on the Black Hawks. Less than nine minutes into the first half, Trevor Momeyer sent a free kick in from 40 yards out. The Bethel Park goalkeeper misjudged the ball and it went over him into the goal.

Momeyer contributed to another goal eight minutes later. The senior sent a corner kick to the front of the net from the left and fellow senior Joe Salesi was there to send it in.

Less than a minute left before the break, Nick Tarabrella sent a shot in from 20 yards out to push the lead to 3-0.

“We were able to relax,” Nese said. “It was a really slick field. One missed kick of a ball can change the complexion of the game. So a multiple goal lead can allow players to relax and be comfortable with the ball and not lead to the mistakes.”

Momeyer was able to get behind the defense early in the second half and buried a shot into the back of the goal with 38:36 to play in the game.

The Warriors rounded out the scoring late in the game as Salesi scored off a second corner kicker from Momeyer.

“(Trevor) gave us a few really nice crosses,” Nese said. “He got some good balls into the box for our forwards and created some opportunities.”

Zach Werksman picked up the win in goal. Despite being in his first season with the squad, the senior has seen gradually more playing time and brings great athletic ability due to his skills from volleyball.

Senior Dylan Adamson came in and played the final 29 minutes. For Penn-Trafford, having the two seniors, along with sophomore Logan Kreutzberger, is a luxury for the team.

“Werksman can jump over the bar being a volleyball guy,” Nese said. “That is a huge advantage for us when we play someone good on free kicks. Dylan and Logan are more sound technically and tight. With the conditions (against Bethel Park), we thought they'd try to take advantage of free kicks.”

Penn-Trafford was set to face Pine-Richland in the quarterfinals on Wednesday. Results were unavailable at press time.

Nathan Smith is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @NSmith_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me