ShareThis Page
Boys Soccer

WPIAL champion Norwin girls score comeback win over Seneca Valley

| Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2015, 9:45 p.m.
Norwin players celebrate with Emily Harrigan after her second goal tied their PIAA Class AAA first-round game against Seneca Valley on Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2015, at Mars. Norwin won 3-2 in double overtime.
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Norwin players celebrate with Emily Harrigan after her second goal tied their PIAA Class AAA first-round game against Seneca Valley on Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2015, at Mars. Norwin won 3-2 in double overtime.
Norwin's Emily Harrigan (center) celebrates her second goal to tie the game against Seneca Valley with teammates during a PIAA Class AAA first round state playoff Tuesday, Nov.10, 2015, at Mars High School. Norwin won, 3-2, in double overtime.
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Norwin's Emily Harrigan (center) celebrates her second goal to tie the game against Seneca Valley with teammates during a PIAA Class AAA first round state playoff Tuesday, Nov.10, 2015, at Mars High School. Norwin won, 3-2, in double overtime.

The Norwin girls soccer team refused to lose.

The WPIAL champion Knights rallied from a two-goal halftime deficit to defeat Seneca Valley, 3-2, in double overtime at Mars on Tuesday night to win their first game in the PIAA Class AAA playoffs since 2010.

“Before we went out for the second overtime, our seniors said ‘we are not done,' ” Norwin coach Lauren Czapor-Karcher said. “We shut them down in the second half and the first overtime. (The players) said they knew we'd get one in. And we did.”

After battling to a stalemate in the first overtime, Lexie Kolano scored off a cross 1:20 into the second overtime for the win.

Norwin (23-0) previously defeated the Raiders twice this season, 1-0 on Oct. 9 and 2-0 on Nov. 2 in the WPIAL semifinals.

Seneca Valley struck first just 6 minutes in when a cross from the left was knocked out by the Knights defense, but Cassidy Testa collected the rebound and buried it in the back of the net. Just under 10 minutes later, Sarah Anderson scored to make it 2-0.

Norwin's best opportunity to score in the first half came in the final two minutes when a Jess Boytim free kick from 40 yards out was collected by Alexis Kendro, but the sophomore's shot went out of bounds.

“To play a team three times like that is tough, and Seneca Valley is not as easy team to play,” Czapor-Karcher said. “Coming into this game knowing we just played them, we knew they'd be coming out stronger than before. They didn't want their season to end either.”

Emily Harrigan got the Knights on the scoreboard as she split a pair of Raiders defenders and buried the ball into the corner of the goal with 32:31 left in regulation. Harrigan added her second goal with 2 minutes, 35 seconds to play after Norwin reversed field quickly on Seneca Valley's attacking play.

“She is a phenomenal player,” Czapor-Karcher said. “She plays with ease whenever she steps on the field. She doesn't panic. She will take her shots whether they are good ones or not.”

It was the first time this season Norwin gave up more than a single goal. The Knights entered the game outscoring opponents 125-4, but a mix of injuries and using different combinations led to early miscues.

“Defensively they did maintain their composure,” Czapor-Karcher said. “They had a couple of breakdowns. Seneca Valley has a great team and quick forwards. (Goalkeeper) Sam (Wexell) is a smart player and played a great game.”

Norwin will face Downingtown West, which defeated Conestoga Valley, 3-1, in the quarterfinals Saturday at a time and site to be determined.

It was the fourth straight appearance in the PIAA playoffs for the Raiders (17-5). Seneca Valley coach Dave Sylvester declined to comment after the game.

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at nsmith@tribweb.com or via Twitter @NSmith_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me