ShareThis Page

Kiski Area's Miller fueled by PIAA swimming experience

Michael Love
| Sunday, March 19, 2017, 10:36 p.m.

Naomee Miller said her first PIAA AAA swim championship experiences fueled her to get back to the meet next year and improve on her performances.

The Kiski Area freshman competed Saturday and Sunday at Bucknell.

In Sunday's 100-yard breaststroke, she placed 26th in a time of 1:05.92.

“I am pretty excited for next year, and, hopefully, I can get a medal,” said Miller, who is considering a switch from the 200 IM to the 200 free for her sophomore season.

Miller began her two-day journey Saturday with a 24th-place finish (2:09.90) in the 200 individual medley.

“I'm real happy with the way she competed,” Kiski Area coach Dave Hartman said. “A meet the size of this one can quickly take over your emotions. In her case, it didn't do that. She swam well coming off a really fast WPIAL meet.”

There is no time off for Miller as she prepares with her Cavaliers club team for the USA Swimming Speedo sectional meet March 30 to April 2 in Christianburg, Va.

“I know she'll work hard and strive to get good times there,” Hartman said. “She is pretty much on the go all year. She'll be ready when it's time to tackle the high school season again.”

After claiming five state titles, including two state records, on Day 1, the WPIAL captured one more championship on Day 2.

North Allegheny junior Mason Gonzalez won the boys 100 freestyle in 43.62.

The Tigers 400 free relay quartet set a state record in 2:58.00, but the team was disqualified for a false start, and the title went to District 1's Hatboro-Horsham (3:04.70).

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @MLove_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me