ShareThis Page

Sewickley Academy's Ross, Carlynton's Phillips advance to PIAA semifinals

| Friday, May 26, 2017, 10:45 p.m.

Sewickley Academy's Luke Ross and Carlynton's Luke Phillips could get one more rematch.

The WPIAL's top singles tennis players in Class AA each reached the PIAA semifinals after a pair of victories Friday, and with one more win they will face each other in the championship Saturday afternoon.

The two have played countless times during their high school careers.

This season, Phillips defeated Ross in the Section 4 singles finals, 7-6 (7-3), 6-4. Ross returned the favor in the WPIAL finals, 6-3, 1-6, 6-2.

First they have to reach the championship match, however.

Ross will play New Hope Solebury's Adrian Roji, while Phillips plays Lancaster Mennonite's William Wanner. Both matches are at 9 a.m. Saturday at Hershey Racquet Club.

Also on Friday, Sewickley Academy's Sam Sauter lost his quarterfinal match to Wanner, 6-2, 6-1.

In Class AA doubles on Friday, the Sewickley Academy tandems of Arjan Bedi and Nishant Purewall and Neil Rana and Ryan Gex each won two matches to reach the semifinals. They also could meet in the championship match with semifinal-round wins Saturday morning.

California's John Monroe and Josh Wohar lost to Moravian Academy's Abbhi Sekar and Oliver Scott in the quarterfinals 6-4, 6-4.

In Class AAA, Peters Township freshman Connor Bruce reached the PIAA singles semifinals with a pair of straight-set victories. The WPIAL champion will play Lower Merion's Matt Robinson at 11 a.m. Saturday.

WPIAL runner-up Robby Shymansky from Fox Chapel fell short to Downingtown East's Michael Dickson, 6-3, 4-6, 6-3, in the quarterfinals. Obama Academy's Rajan Alagar lost in the first round.

All three local doubles teams were eliminated. Upper St. Clair's Liam Gibbons and Kevin Kwok and Obama Academy's Krishnan Alagar and Sachin Thiagarajan lost in the first round, and Hampton's Ben Ringelsen and Ted Donegan won their first round match before falling in the quarterfinals.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me