ShareThis Page

Norwin win key in race for WPIAL playoff spot

Michael Love
| Tuesday, April 21, 2015, 2:45 p.m.

The Plum varsity boys tennis team almost assured themselves of a spot in the WPIAL Class AAA team playoffs out of Section 1 with its 4-1 victory Friday at Norwin.

The Mustangs' win over the Knights was their fourth in a row after a pair of tough losses to section leaders Penn-Trafford and Franklin Regional last month.

The top four teams from each section advance to the team playoffs, tentatively set to begin next Wednesday.

The top two teams from the 16-team WPIAL field will advance to states.

The pairings are expected to be released Monday.

Franklin Regional, Latrobe and Penn-Trafford already had clinched playoff spots, and the three teams entered this week in a battle for the section championship.

Plum was to host Hempfield on Wednesday in a section match. The contest between the Spartans and Mustangs was to be played past the deadline for this week's edition.

Plum's section finale is set for Friday at 3:30 p.m. at Latrobe.

Carson France and Jason Kuhn, the Section 1-AAA doubles tournament third-place team, advanced to Monday's WPIAL playoffs at The Club in Monroeville.

The Plum duo, seeded 10th, met Pine-Richland's Ben Vinarski and Sid Iyer in the first round, and Vinarski and Iyer moved on with a 10-1 victory.

The Rams duo then was upended by No. 2 seed Dan Bendel and Charlie Strohl from Mt. Lebanon in the quarterfinals.

France and Kuhn clinched a spot at WPIALs when they won their first two matches at the Section 1 tournament on April 13.

The top four teams from the section advanced to WPIALs.

France and Kuhn suffered a semifinal loss to eventual champions Rochan Ramesh and Connor Warwick from Franklin Regional, 6-2, 6-0, but they bounced back in the consolation final with a 7-6 (7-5), 6-1 victory over Penn-Trafford's Anthony Iovino and Tim Seaman.

Michael Love is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5825 or at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me