ShareThis Page

2 Pine-Richland athletes place in top 10 at PIAA track and field championships

| Sunday, May 28, 2017, 11:39 p.m.

The Pine-Richland track and field team sent athletes to Shippensburg to compete in five events at the PIAA Class AAA track and field championships this past weekend.

All of the Rams involved represented their school well, coach Bill Crummy said, with two collecting top-10 finishes.

The highest finisher belonged to senior Amanda Kalin, who took fourth in the 800-meter run with a time of 2 minutes, 10.09 seconds. Her finish was tops among any WPIAL athlete in the event.

Kalin, a Duquesne basketball commit, had never ran track before this season and said she didn't expect to have this much success. Before this season, she said she wasn't even aware the 800 was an event.

“When I found out that running two laps was a thing, I thought I'd be pretty good at that event because I'm not that fast in a sprint but I do have some endurance,” Kalin said.

“It's humbling. I'm lucky to have the ability that I do have. I give credit to my coaches. I might have hated the running that they put me through, but it helped me get to where I am.”

Another senior for the Rams, Zach Randolph, earned 10th in the long jump with a leap of 21 feet, 5 inches. Though he missed qualifying for the final heat by a half-inch, Randolph accrued the second-highest finish at PIAAs for Pine-Richland.

Neither of the girls relay teams, the 400 or 1,600, qualified for the finals. The 400, however, recorded its best time (49.14 seconds) of the season.

“That group — Jodie Berezo, Izzy Greco, Amanda Kalin and Meghan Briski — their time wasn't good enough to make it to finals, but it was their best time of the year so that's a good thing,” Crummy said.

“Kalin will graduate, but the other three will be back next year, too, so that's encouraging.”

The 1,600 group was comprised of Berezo, Briski, Madi Argiro and Livy Miller, and finished with a time of 4:13.15.

Kevin Lohman is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me