ShareThis Page

Fox Chapel's Miller eager for second shot with cross country team

| Sunday, July 9, 2017, 11:00 p.m.
Fox Chapel's Caelan Miller
Fox Chapel's Caelan Miller

In her first year participating in cross country last fall, Fox Chapel rising senior Caelan Miller qualified for the WPIAL and the PIAA Class AAA championships.

She's hoping to improve on her performance this season.

“We started our team practices a few weeks ago, and by the end of the summer, I should be running about 50 miles a week,” Miller said. “My goals this year are to again qualify for both tournaments, and I want to get my time down to 18 minutes.”

Her best time last year was 19 minutes, 50 seconds.

Miller has not decided on a college, but she knows she will major in physical therapy and will continue to run track and cross country.

“I've talked to a few coaches so far, but I really haven't narrowed down my list,” Miller said.

Miller first became involved in running in seventh grade.

“In ninth grade, I began focusing more on track. I've always loved running,” she said.

In addition to track, she played on the FC soccer team as a freshman and sophomore before deciding to try out for cross country.

“I miss the sport of soccer, but I felt more comfortable sticking with cross country, indoor track and outdoor track,” Miller said. “I'll be running the mile, the 800 and the 4X8 (relay) in track again this year.” She qualified for the WPIAL and PIAA track championships in each of her first three seasons with the team.

She believes the cross country team can qualify for states again in the fall.

“We have a pretty young team, but there will be a couple of pretty good sophomores on the team this year,” Miller said. “We'll all be pushing each other to do our best. I think it will be a fun season.”

Marty Stewart is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me