‘Huddle Up with Gus’: Mike Jarvis discusses his rise through high school, NCAA coaching | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

‘Huddle Up with Gus’: Mike Jarvis discusses his rise through high school, NCAA coaching

1440403_web1_AP_863562777333
AP
Florida Atlantic coach Mike Jarvis watches during the first half against Duke in Durham, N.C., Friday, Nov. 15, 2013.

As a high school basketball player in Cambridge, Mass., Mike Jarvis stepped into Boston Garden, and he was hooked.

Jarvis, a senior, and his Rindge Technical High School teammates won the championship in front of 13,000-plus fans. But a junior-college scout also had seen the tournament, and he got a scholarship before making his way to Division I Northeastern.

His involvement in college basketball was far from over.

Jarvis joins Gus Frerotte and Dave Hager in this week’s “Huddle Up with Gus” podcast to discuss his early rise and what eventually led him to becoming a successful college basketball coach.

Among the notable stops along his coaching career? Coaching future Basketball Hall of Famer Patrick Ewing — “the next Bill Russell,” Jarvis said — in high school and grooming him for Georgetown, where Ewing chose to play in college.

“Patrick didn’t have to score to be a happy player, he just had to win,” Jarvis said. “He made my job easy.”

Listen to the entire podcast below.

LISTEN: Mike Jarvis on his rise through NCAA, coaching a young Patrick Ewing

Categories: Sports | US-World | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.