ShareThis Page
Inconsistency could keep Penguins from early postseason clinching | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Inconsistency could keep Penguins from early postseason clinching

Jonathan Bombulie
| Saturday, February 9, 2019 7:30 p.m
733590_web1_AP_19039104078917
AP
The puck gets past Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Casey DeSmith (1) on the game-winning goal scored by Florida Panthers defenseman Mike Matheson during overtime of an NHL hockey game, Thursday, Feb. 7, 2019, in Sunrise, Fla. The Panthers won 3-2 in overtime.

Coming into Saturday’s games, the teams in second through ninth place in the Eastern Conference were separated by seven points.

At least one good team will be sitting at home disappointed when the playoffs start.

Given their inconsistency, it’s reasonable to expect the Pittsburgh Penguins will be fighting for their playoff lives through to the last week of the season. Coach Mike Sullivan, however, said he has not yet resigned himself to that fact.

“I haven’t really resigned myself to anything,” he said. “We’re trying to win the game right in front of us. As long as we focus on the short term and we control what we can to get the results, then everything else will take care of itself.”

Injury report

Justin Schultz continued to practice with the team Saturday morning as he gets closer to a return from a broken leg. Sullivan said the fact Schultz has yet to return to the lineup despite being cleared for contact since Monday is not unexpected.

“He’s missed a fair amount of time, so we’re trying to get him as many practices and full-contact practices as we possibly can so that when he does go in, he has the ability to have success,” Sullivan said.



Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.