Iowa State fan raises $1 million for children’s hospital with beer money sign | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Iowa State fan raises $1 million for children’s hospital with beer money sign

Frank Carnevale
1722093_web1_GettyImages-852374846
Getty
Lee Corso, Kirk Herbstreit, Chris Fowler are seen during a 2017 ESPN’s College GameDay show in New York City.

Carson King, a 24-year-old Iowa State fan from Altoona, Iowa, became famous last week after he and his hand-written sign made a cameo on ESPN’s “College GameDay.”

“Busch Light supply needs replenished,” read his sign, which provided a Venmo account to send money to. He thought he’d gets some laughs and a few dollars.

Instead he quickly got enough cash for a case of beer, and then some. When he reached $600, he told his family he’d donate it to the children’s hospital in Iowa City. He was ecstatic after he reached $8,000.

As of Wednesday he has raised over $1.13 million for University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital.

Busch Beer and Venmo both pledged to match the money King was able to raise.

Throughout his quick rise to “Iowa legend” status, King has been supported by his family and community, but the fame did dredge up ugly social media posts.

A check of King’s social media revealed two racist jokes, the Des Moines Register reported. The tweets dated back to 2012, when King was a 16-year-old high school student, according to the newspaper.

King has apologized for the posts.

“I am embarrassed and stunned to reflect on what I thought was funny when I was 16-year-old,” he said in a statement posted to Facebook. “I want to sincerely apologize.”

Busch Beer has cut ties with King, but stated that they are committed to match the donations.

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | US-World | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.