Islanders not worried they finished off Penguins too quickly | TribLIVE.com
NHL

Islanders not worried they finished off Penguins too quickly

Jonathan Bombulie
1078558_web1_GTR-Pens204-041719
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
The Islanders celebrate after scoring an empty-net goal late in the third period during their game against the Penguins in the Stanley Cup Playoffs at PPG Paints Arena on April 16, 2019.

The New York Islanders doesn’t seem to be worried that they finished off the Pittsburgh Penguins too fast.

After completing a four-game sweep of the Penguins on April 16, the Islanders will begin their second-round series with Carolina on Friday night.

The 10-day break between games is tied for the third-longest in NHL history.

The Montreal Canadiens had to wait 13 days before facing the Seattle Metropolitans in the 1919 Stanley Cup Final.

The Mighty Ducks of Anaheim had to wait 11 days between the Western Conference finals and Stanley Cup Final against New Jersey in 2003.

The Devils beat the Ducks in seven games in 2003. In 1919, the finals were canceled after five games due to a flu epidemic.

The Islanders had three days off during their layoff, including the two days immediately following a 3-1 win over the Penguins in Game 4. Otherwise, they’ve practiced every day, including an intrasquad scrimmage on Tuesday.

“We’re trying everything we can, other than playing an exhibition game against someone,” Islanders coach Barry Trotz told NHL.com. “Trust me, we’re fresh. We’ll get the rust off. It may take a little bit, but we haven’t had game action for a bit. That will come. That’s not an issue. We’re going to be enthused. It’s grueling. The less games you can play, there’s a benefit to it.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | NHL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.