IUP women fall in semifinals | TribLIVE.com
District College

IUP women fall in semifinals

Bill Beckner
943841_web1_PTR-HSBasketball-Stock
WPIAL basketball coverage by TribHSSN.

Another thrilling run through the NCAA Division II Women’s Basketball Tournament finally came to an end for IUP Wednesday night in Columbus, Ohio.

The Crimson Hawks were stopped in the Final Four for the second straight year as Southwestern Oklahoma used a strong fourth quarter to register a 66-57 victory at Old Dominican’s Alumni Hall.

IUP, seeded third in the Elite Eight, ends another season that oozed with March Madness at 30-4.

The No. 2 Bulldogs (35-1) outscored IUP in the fourth, 21-8.

IUP took a 49-45 lead into the final quarter. Back-to-back 3-pointers by the Bulldogs put them ahead 53-51 and they never trailed again.

Senior Carolyn Appleby (Greensburg Central Catholic), who played through a leg injury she sustained early in the game, led IUP with 13 points. Senior Brittany Robinson and redshirt sophomore Courtney Alexander (OLSH) each scored 12 in the loss.

Alexander made four 3-pointers.

Forward Bethany Franks led Southwestern Oklahoma with 14 points and 12 rebounds, making 6 of 12 shots in 40 minutes. Hayden Pritty added 13 points and Hailey Tucker had 11 points, seven rebounds and six assists. The Bulldogs shot just 36 percent from the field but made 13 of 16 free throws and 9 3-pointers.

The Bulldogs held a 45-32 edge in rebounds.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.