ShareThis Page
IUP women limit Seton Hill’s perimeter shooting in PSAC quarterfinal victory | TribLIVE.com
District College

IUP women limit Seton Hill’s perimeter shooting in PSAC quarterfinal victory

Dave Mackall
| Wednesday, March 6, 2019 9:48 p.m
840024_web1_web-basketball5

For a time, it looked as though Seton Hill’s improbable, late-season run in women’s basketball might continue Wednesday night.

Then No. 14 IUP’s offense started to click midway through the third quarter.

Carolyn Appleby scored 28 points and Brittany Robinson scored 16, including the 1,000th of her college career, and added 12 rebounds, as host IUP advanced in the NCAA Division II Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference playoffs with a 67-53 victory in the quarterfinals, ending Seton Hill’s season.

IUP coach Tom McConnell became the winningest women’s basketball coach at the school, improving his record to 142-37. His overall record, including seven seasons as men’s coach at St. Francis (Pa.), is 227-142.

“It’s great, but there’ll be a time and a place to talk about and reflect on it,” McConnell said. “I’ve been very, very, very blessed to coach good players. Not just good players, but good players with great families. I’ve had a front-row seat.”

IUP (24-3) advances to the semifinals against Bloomsburg on Saturday at Kutztown.

IUP’s victory avenged a stunning 12-point setback to Seton Hill in the regular-season finale four days earlier, then-No. 8 IUP’s only home loss of the season.

The Griffins’ success in that game came largely because of a 10-for-24 shooting effort from 3-point range.

On Monday, they were 14 for 30 from long range in a PSAC first-round victory over Pitt-Johnstown, and on Feb. 27, they shot 10 for 24 in a regular-season victory over then-No. 17 Cal (Pa.).

But Seton Hill (19-11), which saw its four-game winning streak stopped, managed to shoot just 3 for 20 from 3-point range in its latest meeting with IUP.

“We just knew that’s where it had to start for us,” McConnell said. “Guard the 3-point line. I don’t know what their low for the season is, but three is a pretty good number for us. You have to guard them out there.”

Lauren Wolosik, a North Catholic graduate, added 12 points for IUP. Megan Marecic led Seton Hill with 16 points.

“Seton Hill is an unbelievable team,” said Appleby, the former Greensburg Central Catholic girls basketball star. “All the credit goes to them. They’ve got a great coach and great players. They knock down 3s like no other team, and to hold them to three shows how hard we worked in the gym on lock-down defense.”

After Seton Hill took its only lead of the game, 38-36, on a 3-pointer by Marecic, IUP used a 10-0 run to go ahead 46 -38 with 3 minutes remaining in the third quarter.

The Crimson Hawks pushed the lead to double digits on a pair of foul shots by Appleby with 2:34 to go to take a 62-51 advantage and were never threatened.

Seton Hill coach Mark Katarski took on a bittersweet feeling afterward, showing part disappointment and part pride.

“It was really just such a special couple of weeks for this group,” he said. “We’ll finish this season winning seven out of 10 games. We were picked to finish sixth in (the PSAC Western Division). We finished fourth with wins over two nationally-ranked teams.

“It was just magical the way they came together at the end. It was just an amazing thing to watch as a coach.”

Dave Mackall is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.