Franklin Regional grad Palmer Jackson stays hot at USGA Amateur |
U.S./World Sports

Franklin Regional grad Palmer Jackson stays hot at USGA Amateur

Paul Schofield

Murrysville native Palmer Jackson continued his hot playing, this time in the opening round of the U.S. Amateur on Monday at Pinehurst Resort and Country Club in Pinehurst, N.C.

Playing the opening round on course No. 4, Jackson fired a 4-under-par 66 and is tied for second place with Trevor Werbylo, a shot behind leader Brandon Wu, who shot 5-under 65.

Jackson shot 1-under par 34 on the front nine then carded five birdies, including three consecutive, to shoot 32 on the back. He finished with seven birdies and three bogeys.

The 2019 Franklin Regional graduate and Notre Dame commit has posted nine consecutive competitive rounds in the 60s.

He is one of three players competing from Hannastown Golf Club. Greensburg’s Mark Goetz shot a 6-over 76 on No. 4, and Oakmont’s Sean Knapp shot an 8-over 78 after taking a 9 on the second hole on No. 4.

The other Western Pennsylvania golfers competing are McKees Rock’s Trent Karlik (3-over 73 on No. 4) and Peters Township’s Connor Schmidt (6-over 76 on No. 2).

The players will switch courses for the second round, then the field of 312 will be pared to the low 64 for match play, which begins Wednesday.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.