James Conner expects Steelers to spread carries evenly | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

James Conner expects Steelers to spread carries evenly

Jonathan Bombulie
1284794_web1_gtr-steelers04-061319
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers offensive coordinator Randy Fichtner (right) talks with running back James Conner.

James Conner was a workhorse in his first season as a Pittsburgh Steelers starter last year, eating up more than 62% of the carries in the ground game and 64% of the targets to running backs in the passing game.

At least one key player in the locker room believes those figures will change next season.

Conner himself.

“I think it’ll be spread out pretty evenly,” Conner said after a minicamp practice session Wednesday afternoon.

Conner thinks the Steelers will take a more balanced approach to divvying up touches for one significant reason: He likes what he has seen from the other running backs.

Jaylen Samuels went for 328 yards from scrimmage in the three games Conner missed with an ankle injury late last season. Fourth-round draft pick Benny Snell ran for 1,449 yards and 16 touchdowns at Kentucky last year.

“I’ve seen his college tape. He’s also learned the offense really quick. I know he’ll be ready to play this year,” Conner said. “Jaylen, obviously, is going to make a lot of plays, too.”

Conner hopes, however, the Steelers aren’t planning to divide carries more evenly out of concerns about his durability. That’s not a problem, he insisted.

“I’m durable,” Conner said. “I missed a couple games. No matter what shape you’re in or how your body is, that happens. You know that’s going to happen.”

Offensive coordinator Randy Fichtner said he has no concerns about Conner’s durability, but he said making sure the third-year Pitt product gets his rest is important.

“I think you monitor it no matter what,” Fichtner said. “I don’t know that you want to put any of the backs in that situation.”

Ultimately, the head coach will make the decision regarding the way carries are split. He still is considering all sides of the situation.

“James’ versatility and level of conditioning will be factors in that discussion,” Mike Tomlin said. “We’re open to it. All people are working hard, but there are some other viable men. It’s just not a two-man discussion at the running back position. I’ve been pleased with the progress of the larger body.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.