James Conner, JuJu Smith-Schuster sit out practice again for Steelers | TribLIVE.com

James Conner, JuJu Smith-Schuster sit out practice again for Steelers

Joe Rutter
Pittsburgh Steelers offensive guard Ramon Foster (73) helps wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster (19) after an injury during the first half of an NFL football game against the Cleveland Browns, Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019, in Cleveland.

It is increasingly likely the Pittsburgh Steelers will face the winless Cincinnati Bengals on Sunday without two of their starting skill position players.

Running back James Conner (shoulder) and wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster (concussion/knee) did not practice Thursday for the second day in a row. The 5-5 Steelers have just one more practice before they face the 0-10 Bengals on Sunday at Paul Brown Stadium.

Wide receiver Diontae Johnson (concussion) was a full practice participant for the second consecutive day and will give the Steelers two healthy starting receivers — James Washington being the other — against the Bengals.

Benny Snell (knee) also practiced for the second day in a row and figures to be part of the running back rotation the Steelers will use in the absence of Conner. Jaylen Samuels will be the starter.

Outside linebacker Bud Dupree (arm) was a full participant after being limited Wednesday. Tight ends Nick Vannett (illness) and Vance McDonald (non-injury) practiced fully as did inside linebacker Mark Barron (non-injury).

Cornerback Artie Burns (knee) was limited for the second consecutive practice.

Center Maurkice Pouncey (suspension) and guard Ramon Foster (non-injury) did not practice.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.