Jeannette grad Robert Kennedy pulls in pair of local offers | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Jeannette grad Robert Kennedy pulls in pair of local offers

Bill Beckner
1441748_web1_GTR-JeannetteHC07-120817
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
1441748_web1_FootballStock

Coming out of Jeannette, Robert Kennedy was considered one of the better football talents — and all around athletes —- in the state.

A quarterback, wide receiver and defensive back for the WPIAL and PIAA Class A champion Jayhawks two years ago, Kennedy opted to attend Lackawanna, a junior college in Scranton, where he could hone his skills, get his academics in order and possibly move on to a Division I program.

The former small-schools “Mr. PA Football” is on the right track: He announced he has picked up local FCS offers from Robert Morris and Duquesne.

Kennedy (5-10, 172) had three interceptions, six pass breakups and 26 tackles as a defensive back last season at Lackawanna, which went 11-0 and won the El Toro Bowl.

Initially, five schools — Howard, Albany, Duquesne, St. Francis (Pa.) and Robert Morris — showed interest in Kennedy later in his prep career. Howard and St. Francis offered, but those deals were fleeting.

A Pennsylvania Sports Writers’ co-Class A Player of the Year, Kennedy passed for 1,462 yards and 25 touchdowns and rushed for 1,356 yards and 22 scores as a senior. He also pulled in 12 interceptions.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.