‘Jeopardy!’ champ James Holzhauer: Browns are ‘worst bet’ to win Super Bowl | TribLIVE.com
NFL

‘Jeopardy!’ champ James Holzhauer: Browns are ‘worst bet’ to win Super Bowl

Frank Carnevale
1447097_web1_gtr-mayfield-072019
Steelers linebacker T.J. Watt pressures Browns browns quarterback Baker Mayfield in the third quarter Sunday, Oct. 28, 2018 at Heinz Field.

“Jeopardy!” champion James Holzhauer, who makes his living as a professional gambler, says to stay away from the Cleveland Browns hype.

“They’re probably the single worst bet to win the Super Bowl right now,” Holzhauer told Peter King’s “Football Morning in America.”

Holzhauer, who won $2.46 million in a 33-episode run, said last year’s Super Bowls teams, the New England Patriots and the Los Angeles Rams, are the smart but boring picks to win the championship.

King also talked to Holzhauer about his “Jeopardy!” fame, love of grape soda and other football betting strategies (which include picking the teams that land the bye during the playoffs).

Here’s Holzhauer’s quick take on next year’s Super Bowl contenders:

“If I had to pick a team or two to make it to the Super Bowl, win the Super Bowl, the boring answer is the Patriots and the Rams. Everyone knows these guys are the best teams out there. But if you’re looking to invest in a futures ticket, I would say that the big thing to avoid is look away from the teams that have all the hype surrounding them. I can’t believe we live in a world where the Cleveland Browns are the most-hyped team in the preseason. But I would say they’re probably the single worst bet to win the Super Bowl right now.”

The sports books are in agreement. VegasInsider.com lists the Browns, along with the Pittsburgh Steelers and Dallas Cowboys, at 20-1 odds to win the next Super Bowl, putting them ahead of most of the league, but still far from the best odds. The Patriots and Kansas City Chiefs have the best odds at 6-1.

But the Browns, who finished 7-8-1 in 2018, have been the hot storyline this offseason. Second-year quarterback Baker Mayfield is expected to flourish in an offense stocked with weapons, including recently acquired wide receivers Odell Odell Beckham Jr. and Jarvis Landry.

But the Browns are coming off an 11th-straight losing season and haven’t made the playoffs since 2002.

Not everyone, including the Trib’s Mark Madden, is buying the hype. Madden wrote: “The Cleveland Browns, meantime, are bolstered by hype worthy of the Backstreet Boys in the ’90s. It is gratuitous. It is loud. It is nonstop, and it is annoying.”

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.