Jets’ Le’Veon Bell rips NFL for ‘random’ 5th HGH test |

Jets’ Le’Veon Bell rips NFL for ‘random’ 5th HGH test

Associated Press
Jets running back Le’Veon Bell gets past Redskins safety Montae Nicholson in the first half Sunday, Nov. 17, 2019, in Landover, Md.

FLORHAM PARK, N.J. — Former Pittsburgh Steeler Le’Veon Bell is throwing a flag on the NFL’s drug testing policy.

The New York Jets running back said Wednesday he has been unfairly targeted by the league after taking a fifth test this season for performance enhancers and criticizes the NFL’s policy.

“I done had 5 ‘random’ HGH blood test in 10 weeks,” Bell tweeted. “@NFL I’m not doing another after today, whatever y’all lookin for it obviously ain’t there.

The random drug testing is part of a collectively bargained policy between the NFL and NFL Players Association. An independent administrator determines via a computer program which players are tested each week. Per NFL rules, players with no previous violations of the policy on performance enhancers won’t be tested more than six times in a calendar year.

“He never said anything to me about it,” coach Adam Gase said. “It’s something out of our control.”

Bell was suspended by the NFL for two games in 2014 while he was with the Steelers after he was charged with marijuana possession and DUI, a violation of the league’s substance abuse policy. He also was suspended four games in 2016 for missing a test.

He signed with the Jets last March after sitting out last season in a contract dispute. Bell made headlines this summer when he missed portions of training camp practices on consecutive days to take league-mandated tests.

Bell is off to the worst start of his career, averaging 3.2 yards per carry. He has also yet to rush for more than 100 yards in a game this season. Bell is second on the team in receptions with 46 for 309 yards and one TD.

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.