Joe Haden, James Conner in, Vince Williams out for Steelers vs. 49ers |

Joe Haden, James Conner in, Vince Williams out for Steelers vs. 49ers

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers James Conner with a third-quarter run against the Seahawks Sunday, Sept. 15, 2019 at Heinz Field.

At the end of a week in which the Pittsburgh Steelers lost their starting quarterback, the rest of the news regarding their injuries was more positive.

Cornerback Joe Haden, running back James Conner and tight end Vance McDonald are starters who missed practice time this week but were given the green light Friday to play in Sunday’s game at the San Francisco 49ers. Conner suffered a knee injury during the second half of last week’s loss to the Seattle Seahawks, and McDonald had a back injury that prevented him from practicing fully Wednesday.

Haden suffered a sprained AC joint in his shoulder during Week 1. Although he has been practicing sparingly since, he played a full game against the Seahawks.

Haden said he “definitely” felt better this week than he did last Friday at the end of a practice week. Haden said the shoulder bothered him “a little bit” during last week’s loss.

“It hurts, but you kind of just get past that just knowing it’s going to be there a little bit,” Haden said. “But I can still get full range of motion and everything. That’s the main thing.”

Inside linebacker Vince Williams (hamstring), special-teamer Roosevelt Nix (knee) and reserve outside linebacker Anthony Chickillo (foot) were declared out for Sunday’s game.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.