ShareThis Page
John Steigerwald: Experience says Penguins or Capitals will win Eastern Conference | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

John Steigerwald: Experience says Penguins or Capitals will win Eastern Conference

991602_web1_AP_19093015216713
AP
Penguins right wing Phil Kessel greets teammates after scoring during the first period against the Detroit Red Wings, Tuesday, April 2, 2019, in Detroit.

The Pittsburgh Penguins finished fifth.

Actually, and officially, they finished in third place in the Metropolitan Division behind the Washington Capitals and the New York Islanders and ahead of the Carolina Hurricanes and Columbus Blue Jackets. But Carolina and Columbus won more games.

As you’ve probably noticed, the NHL has a different system for determining who finishes where, and it’s based on points. The Penguins finished third because they had more ties.

Twelve of those ties ended up as losses, but if the NHL didn’t have a point system that really doesn’t make a lot of sense and based it on wins and losses the way Major League Baseball does, here’s what the Metropolitan Division Standings would look like:

1t. Washington 48-34

1t. N.Y. Islanders 48-34

3. Columbus 47-35

4. Carolina 46-36

5. Penguins 44-38

The Penguins did what they had to do in the given system but by just about every other system of ranking teams in just about every other sport, they had the fifth best season in their division.

So what does it mean?

Nothing.

The playoffs start in three days and none of it matters, but it indicates how close things were in the Metropolitan Division. You would have a hard time finding anybody who thinks Carolina or Columbus has a better chance of winning a Stanley Cup than the Penguins. BetonLine.ag has the Penguins at 18-1 odds to win the Cup and the Hurricanes and Blue Jackets are at 25-1.

Tampa Bay is the favorite in the East at 11-4 and Calgary in the West at 8-1.

Taking the Penguins at 18-1 looks like a pretty good bet because of their experience. Hockey, more than any other sport, rewards teams that know how to play in the postseason and sometimes it takes a while for teams to learn how not to play.

The Penguins showed time and again in the regular season they have a switch they can turn on for big games, and every playoff game is big. It’s a big mistake to discount the Penguins because of their regular season inconsistencies.

They might or might not have the talent to win the whole thing but their performance over the past 82 games doesn’t mean they don’t.

The Tampa Bay Lighting, counting just wins and losses, had a better season than the 1927 Yankees. They finished 62-20 for a winning percentage of .756 and won the Atlantic Division by 13 games, which is amazing in an 82-game season.

The Murderer’s Row Yankees finished 110-44 for a .714 winning percentage and won the American League by 19 games.

Of course, the difference for Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig and the boys was they only had to beat the Pirates four times to win the World Championship. The Lightning are playing in the toughest tournament in sports, and they need to win 16 more for the title. They’re probably going to have to beat either the Penguins or the Capitals four times to get to the Final. By that time, their winning percentage will be a distant memory.

The Capitals and the Penguins have won the last three Stanley Cups, and that’s fresh in their minds. It says here one of them will be going to the Final this June.

And the winner in the East will beat whoever comes out of the West.

John Steigerwald is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.