John Steigerwald: NFL preseason games give empty feeling to many |
John Steigerwald, Columnist

John Steigerwald: NFL preseason games give empty feeling to many

John Steigerwald
Steelers quarterback Devlin Hodges looks to throw agains the Buccaneers in the third quarter Friday, Aug. 9, 2019 at Heinz Field.

Exhibition games used to be for the fans.

Now they’re for the coaches, and they’re tough to watch.

Unless you’re watching them like a coach, purely as a way to evaluate players.

And they were called exhibition games before they were called preseason games. Somewhere along the line, somebody at the NFL office decided calling them exhibitions diminished their importance. Preseason was meant for “almost a regular-season game.”

And, for a while, they were.

Now the preseason games are actually exhibitions and have no resemblance to an NFL regular-season game, and the fans know they’re not for them.

That’s why Heinz Field is half empty and why the “noise” on TV sounds like a golf match.

Fans literally can’t give tickets away, but still the games go on.

There was a time when the Steelers’ first exhibition game looked like a real game. First stringers against first stringers. The starting quarterbacks for both teams started the game against the opposing team’s starting defense.

Seems like it was some time around the middle of the Bill Cowher era when the Steelers’ starters would be in for just a possession or two before giving way to players who needed to be evaluated.

Multiple starters showing up in street clothes, as they did Friday night, is a relatively new thing.

Starting players are paid a lot more than they were when they were called exhibition games, but a starting quarterback was every bit as valuable and important to the team’s success then as it is now.

So, the fear of injury hasn’t changed.

And what about those player evaluations?

The coaches know what to look for, but they would probably prefer to evaluate their young players during practice when they’re matched up against the regulars.

Fans and media see Josh Dobbs or Mason Rudolph put together an impressive series of plays at quarterback and they’ll say they did it against guys who will be driving trucks in September.

For some reason they seem to forget that many of the guys in the huddle with them will also be gear jamming soon.

NFL preseason games still serve a purpose. There just isn’t any need to put them in stadiums anymore. How many empty seats will it take to put an end to the misery?

• Of course, there were plenty of impressive performances by players playing against players they won’t see if they’re playing in September.

First-round pick Devin Bush delivered on the promised speed at inside linebacker and looks like a guy ready to play on opening day.

James Washington had a big night at wide receiver, but he did that last summer and then averaged one catch per game in the regular season.

The guy whose slack he’s supposed to pick up averaged about seven times as many. That’s a lot of ground to make up, and nothing he does in the preseason will guarantee that he will come close to doing it.

• The Pirates have successfully established over at least the last 20 years that they are a major league team in name only. Their three-year window of appearing as a real one is long gone.

They’re proving it again right now. A real major league team, no matter what the expectations were before the season, would not lose 23 out of 27 games after the All-Star break and not be angry or embarrassed enough to fire the manager and/or the general manager or both. It also wouldn’t have the arrogance and/or stupidity to believe it could get away with it with its fans.

John Steigerwald is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.