ShareThis Page
Jon Bostic hopes he found a home with Steelers, who have decisions to make at ILB | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Jon Bostic hopes he found a home with Steelers, who have decisions to make at ILB

Chris Adamski
| Tuesday, February 19, 2019 7:00 a.m.
765303_web1_GTR-Steelers54-091018

It’s not difficult to track the trend of Jon Bostic’s role in the Pittsburgh Steelers’ defense last season.

The veteran linebacker played a season-high 59 defensive snaps in the season opener. He played a season-low six snaps on defense in the finale.

At least Bostic appeared in all 16 of the Steelers’ games. That is something he hadn’t accomplished in a season since he was a rookie second-round pick of the Chicago Bears in 2013.

The question over the offseason regarding Bostic and relatively modest accomplishments concerns whether he can remain with the same team over consecutive seasons for the first time since he spent 2013 and 2014 with the Bears.

“Obviously this is my first year here and whatnot; hopefully we can make this place a home,” Bostic said soon after the season ended. “It’s been a fun year; definitely didn’t go the way we would have planned (missing the playoffs). But that’s football. You can’t plan everything out. But I do (feel like the Steelers’ organization can be home).”

The Steelers were Bostic’s fifth NFL home over a 2 ½ -year span when he signed a two-year, $4 million contract with them last March. He purportedly was brought in to compete with Tyler Matakevich for the role replacing Ryan Shazier as the starting left inside linebacker.

But that was a position battle in name only – Bostic opened training camp holding down the spot and never was meaningfully challenged by Matakevich.

Where Bostic did get challenged for playing time was by L.J. Fort. Fort started two of the final four games of the season – and Fort’s emergence as the Steelers’ preference to play in passing situations ahead of Bostic was cemented weeks before that.

Though he remained a reliable tackler and is considered to have good sideline-to-sideline speed, Bostic struggled in coverage. And while he’s viewed as a cerebral player and solid locker-room presence, there’s no guarantee Bostic is in the Steelers’ plans for 2019.

He’ll turn 28 in May and is due a $1.8 million salary. If he’s cut, the Steelers will eat only $700,000 in “dead money.”

The Steelers are expected to infuse talent at inside linebacker over this offseason, with perhaps only starting right inside backer Vince Williams assured of staying. Fort is a free agent. Bostic and Matakevich were the only other inside linebackers on the roster or practice squad (Keith Kelsey was injured all season).

“I think we’ve really do got a good group, guys who kind of blend well with each other,” Bostic said. “A lot of different personalities in that room. But it all kind of comes together, and you see it as a defense. On defense, everybody meshes really well. I know the NFL is always changing all over the place, as much as we can kind of keep the group together moving forward will be important for us.”

Bostic graded out as “Average” overall in grading by Pro Football Focus for last season.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.