JuJu Smith-Schuster, James Conner, Vance McDonald, Cameron Heyward miss Steelers practice | TribLIVE.com

JuJu Smith-Schuster, James Conner, Vance McDonald, Cameron Heyward miss Steelers practice

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers’ JuJu Smith-Schuster takes the field for the Seahawks game Sunday, Sept. 15, 2019 at Heinz Field.

JuJu Smith-Schuster was a surprise addition to the Pittsburgh Steelers’ injury report Wednesday when he sat out practice because of a toe injury. The wide receiver had injured a toe during the opener at New England last month, but he played in the Week 2 loss to Seattle.

There was no immediate indication if this toe ailment was related to the one from last month.

Running back James Conner (ankle) and defensive end Cameron Heyward (quadricep) also did not practice two days after suffering injuries during Monday night’s win against Cincinnati. Both returned to that game.

Tight end Vance McDonald (shoulder) and special-teamer Anthony Chickillo (foot) and Roosevelt Nix (knee) all sat out practice Wednesday. All three missed Monday’s game; Nix has not played since Week 1. Coach Mike Tomlin said all three have a chance to play during this coming Sunday’s game against the Baltimore Ravens.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.