Kevin Gorman: In musical outfield, Pirates should save Bryan Reynolds a seat | TribLIVE.com
Kevin Gorman, Columnist

Kevin Gorman: In musical outfield, Pirates should save Bryan Reynolds a seat

Kevin Gorman
1266201_web1_1146383412
Getty Images
The Pirates’ Bryan Reynolds celebrates with teammates after hitting a two-run homer in the second inning against the Dodgers on May 26, 2019.

The Pittsburgh Pirates have dealt with so many injuries to their outfielders this season that they have been forced to play a game of musical chairs, starting nine players.

When Corey Dickerson returns from a 60-day stint on the injured list, however, the Pirates will have a crowded outfield. It’s unlikely they will carry five outfielders for the remainder of the season.

Regardless of what moves are made, there should be a seat reserved for Bryan Reynolds.

When the Pirates lost a pair of Gold Glove winners in left fielder Corey Dickerson and center fielder Starling Marte to injuries, they were prompted to promote a minor leaguer best known for being a return piece in the Andrew McCutchen trade and one who had played only 13 games at the Triple-A level.

And the returns have been impressive.

Reynolds immediately proved that he can hit major league pitching, tying Gregory Polanco’s club record with hits in 11 consecutive games to start his career.

Not only does Reynolds lead all rookies with a .346 batting average and .404 on-base percentage, but those numbers also are the best on the Pirates, and his .549 slugging percentage and .953 OPS rank only behind Josh Bell.

The switch-hitting Reynolds is riding a 14-game hitting streak entering Friday’s game at Milwaukee.

Reynolds hasn’t hit as well in eight games in the No. 2 spot in the batting order (.286/.342/.371) as he did in 16 games at No. 5 (.328/.379/.492), despite batting in front of a hot-hitting Marte. And if there’s a real knock on Reynolds, it’s his play in the field.

But defense can be improved. Dickerson is proof. Hitting is the toughest thing to do in baseball, and Reynolds is a natural with a smooth swing and calm approach.

The Pirates should resist the urge to send Reynolds to Indianapolis. Triple-A pitching wasn’t much of a challenge for Reynolds before his call-up as he was slashing .367/.446/.735 with five homers and 11 RBIs with the Indians.

Where the Pirates need help is on their pitching staff. They could deal from a position of strength and trade a veteran outfielder to a team in need, like the Philadelphia Phillies.

A better alternative would be to shop Dickerson, given that he’s making $8.5 million and will be a free agent next year.

Trading Marte is another option, in the final guaranteed year of his contract, with the Pirates holding club options at $11.5 million in 2020 and $12.5 million in 2021, but he’s their only center fielder. Melky Cabrera is on a one-year deal but has provided veteran leadership for the Latin players in a young clubhouse.

Regardless of what happens, Reynolds has shown that his bat belongs in the majors.

The Pirates should save him a seat, even if it’s on the bench.

Love baseball? Stay up-to-date with the latest Pittsburgh Pirates news.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.