Kevin Gorman: Islanders’ sweep provides painful ending for Penguins |

Kevin Gorman: Islanders’ sweep provides painful ending for Penguins

Kevin Gorman

It was a sorry scene, seeing the Pittsburgh Penguins skate off their home ice Tuesday night after being swept by the New York Islanders in this Stanley Cup playoffs first-round series.

Don’t blame the Penguins for being in a state of disbelief after being swept into a perfect storm. Only two years ago, they were celebrating back-to-back Cup championships in June. Now, after a 3-1 Game 4 loss Tuesday night at PPG Paints Arena, their season has ended before Easter.

“It hurts,” said Penguins winger Jake Guentzel, whose goal 35 seconds into the first period brought the sellout crowd to a crescendo. “These fans have been here for us all year. To lose these two on home ice in front of them, we wanted to thank them for all they done but it doesn’t feel good.”

As painful as it was for the Penguins, it also was merciful.

If not for the Penguins, then it was for us. We don’t have to watch them pound their heads against a brick wall anymore, repeatedly trying the same tactics to beat an Islanders team that played better together, with more conviction, stronger defense, greater goaltending and able to capitalize on every chance.

Give the Islanders a stick tap for solving the Penguins with a strategy as simple as it was sound: Play the percentages, wait for them to make mistakes and then pounce.

That’s why it was only going to end this way, with the Islanders winning a close game to clinch the series. I’m convinced the Penguins and Islanders could have continued playing — for five, seven or 10 games — and they all would have ended in the same fashion. That’s how much the Islanders were in control.

If that wasn’t clear after the overtime loss in Game 1, it became more obvious after the second game at Nassau Coliseum. Nothing about home-ice advantage helped the Penguins avoid falling into the trap set by the Islanders time and time again. Not swapping Jack Johnson for Olli Maatta on defense. Not switching sticks in practice. Not taking a day off from skating. Not shuffling the lines. Not shaking up the power play.

“We knew what to expect,” Penguins captain Sidney Crosby said. “They were going to try to force us into making mistakes and capitalize. We knew they were comfortable playing low-scoring games.

“It was a combination of us not (scoring on) some of those chances — usually automatic for us — and that’s the kind of game that allows them to hang around. They get a couple odd-man rushes and bury some of those. That’s how fine the line is in the playoffs. Unfortunately, we were on the wrong side of those.”

Crosby took this loss hard. And he took it personally, after scoring his only point by assisting on Guentzel’s lone goal. Crosby knew the Penguins had their chances, whether it was his shot that ricocheted off the left post on a second-period power play or Phil Kessel’s shot that skipped off the shin of sliding Islanders defenseman Scott Mayfield in the crease in the third.

“When you look at the nature of the way the games were played, it was a whole lot closer than the optics,” Penguins coach Mike Sullivan said. “Every game, for that matter, was a one-goal game. We might have given up a second goal late in the game because we were pressing but, for the most part, it was a fairly even game. It boils down to critical moments and making sure you make the right plays at the right time.”

The Islanders did, repeatedly, especially after the Penguins took a lead. The Islanders scored minutes after Erik Gudbranson’s goal in Game 2, after Garrett Wilson’s goal in Game 3 and after Guentzel’s goal in Game 4. That those three leads lasted a combined 4 minutes, 51 seconds is astounding. The Islanders responded to adversity with an answer.

The Penguins had none.

They were grasping at straws to explain it and will spend the rest of spring and into the summer wondering why.

“It’s disappointing because it seemed like that was the case the whole series,” Sullivan said. “Every time we scored, we’d get some momentum and we’d give it back shortly thereafter. It’s such a game of momentum. When you can hang on to it, it certainly helps your team.”

When you can’t, the ending is inevitable.

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Islanders’ Ryan Pulock cross-checks the Penguins’ Sidney Crosby in the third period during Game 4 of round one of the Stanley Cup Playoffs on Tuesday, April 16, 2019, at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Sidney Crosby shakes the hand of the Islanders’ Tom Kuhnhackl after losing game 4 of round one of the Stanley Cup Playoffs Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.