Kevin Gorman: Penguins banking big on Jim Rutherford’s makeover moves |

Kevin Gorman: Penguins banking big on Jim Rutherford’s makeover moves

Kevin Gorman
Pittsburgh Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford has his final meeting of the season with the media at the NHL hockey team’s practice facility in Cranberry, Pa., Wednesday, May 9, 2018. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)
Brandon Tanev has 51 points (24 goals, 27 assists) in 195 career NHL games.

The Pittsburgh Penguins raised eyebrows around the NHL on Monday when they signed winger Brandon Tanev to a free-agent contract that was long in term and steep in price.

General manager Jim Rutherford was blunt in his assessment of the price to pay to sign a bottom-six forward who had 14 goals and 29 points last season on the first day of free agency.

Apparently, it’s six years and $21 million.

“It’s the way things work on July 1,” Rutherford said Monday at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex in Cranberry. “You either give the player close to what he wants, or you don’t get the player.”

It’s also the way things worked June 29, when the Penguins wanted to get rid of the player. They gave Phil Kessel exactly what he wanted — a one-way ticket to Phoenix to play for the Arizona Coyotes — in return for a winger and a prospect.

Beats a wing and a prayer, I guess.

Last July 1, Rutherford gave Jack Johnson a five-year, $16.5 million contract in free agency, only for the defenseman to prove to be a player the Penguins wish they didn’t get.

Tanev comes at a cost but looks like a perfect fit for the Penguins. He ranked third in the NHL with 287 hits and led the Winnipeg Jets with 81 blocked shots. He’s strong on the forecheck and penalty kill and can score short-handed goals.

Rutherford promised a Penguins makeover, and he certainly has delivered a different look to a 100-point team that was swept in the first round of the Stanley Cup playoffs by a team that was swept in the second round by a team that was swept in the Eastern Conference final by a team that lost in the Cup Final.

That’s how far removed the Penguins were from winning a sixth Cup championship last season. Their solution was to trade a point-a-game scorer and sign a bottom-six forward. Those aren’t their only moves, just the most prominent.

But there’s this: Who’s going to score goals?

The Penguins have to replace Kessel’s scoring touch. He had 110 goals and 303 points in four seasons with the Penguins and 27 goals last season despite a 16-game goal-scoring drought.

They acquired Alex Galchenyuk from the Coyotes, but he has 108 goals in his seven-year NHL career. They acquired Dominik Kahun from the Chicago Blackhawks in the Olli Maatta trade, but he had 13 goals in his rookie season. And they acquired Tanev, who has 24 career goals in four seasons with Winnipeg.

For all of Kessel’s defensive deficiencies, he and Galchenyuk were minus-19 last season. Kahun and Tanev combined for a plus-19 rating, but subtracting Maatta (plus-9) and, say, Bryan Rust (plus-10) would cancel that out.

How are the Penguins a better team?

An organization built upon star power, one that hangs banners for its scoring champions, is replacing a highly skilled player with role players. The bottom six is better, but the top six is worse, even if Galchenyuk and Kahun are more productive skating alongside Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin.

Rutherford isn’t done dealing. He had a one-word description of his salary-cap situation — tight — and said “there’s a good chance we will have to make another move.” But it’s likely to be one that involves subtracting salary, not adding scoring.

Of course, there’s the narrative that trading Kessel was addition by subtraction, of ridding the Penguins of their biggest problem because of his defensive indifference, turnovers and attitude.

Maybe it’s true Kessel had fulfilled his role as a hired gun, a sniper who complemented Crosby and Malkin as a third scorer, and had worn out his welcome. Maybe Jake Guentzel’s elevation to 40-goal scorer made Kessel expendable.

Yes, the Penguins now have more balance, depth and versatility, giving them the ability to roll lines and play sound defense. Rutherford continues to take risks and make changes — to the culture and the roster — in an effort to push the Penguins back into Cup contention.

The Penguins gave the players what they wanted.

Now, they’re banking big that Rutherford got the right players.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.