Kevin Gorman: Pitt’s Jared Wilson-Frame puts punctuation on final game at Pete |

Kevin Gorman: Pitt’s Jared Wilson-Frame puts punctuation on final game at Pete

Kevin Gorman
Pitt’s Jared Wilson-Frame scores past Notre Dame’s Juwan Durham in the second half Saturday, March 10, 2019 at Petersen Events Center.
Pitt’s Au’Diese Toney hugs Trey McGowens as Jared Wilson-Frame celebrates after beating Notre Dame in the regular season finale Saturday, March 10, 2019 at Petersen Events Center.

Jeff Capel wanted Pitt to punctuate its ACC regular-season finale by stopping its 13-game losing streak, and the first-year coach likened it to putting a period at the end of a paragraph.

For Jared Wilson-Frame, it was an exclamation point.

The Pitt senior got to walk off the floor at Petersen Events Center with his arms raised as a winner for the first time in a long time and for the last time of his college career after a 56-53 victory over Notre Dame on Saturday afternoon.

“I just feel like we finally completed a mission,” Wilson-Frame said. “We always talk about that at the beginning of the game, that we’ve got to finish games. Whether we’re in games, winning games, even have a chance to come back in a game, we have often dropped the ball in those moments. And it’s often a collective. It’s not an individual thing.

“We collectively overcame the thing that’s been bugging us for awhile, so it felt good to finally get that job done.”

Wilson-Frame came to Pitt two years ago with high hopes, as a junior-college transfer who had watched as a kid in Hartford, Conn., when the Panthers were one of the best programs in the Big East. Instead, he endured dwelling in the basement of the ACC amid a coaching change and the two longest losing streaks in school history.

Pitt lost its final 19 games last season, ending with losses to Notre Dame in the regular-season finale and in the ACC Tournament. That led to the firing of Kevin Stallings and the hiring of Jeff Capel.

The former Duke assistant claimed to be “brutally honest” in his assessment of Wilson-Frame’s game only to see the Panthers’ top returning scorer accept the admonishment and work to make changes to both his playing style and his physique.

“Jared, he’s a guy that believed right away when I got the job. When there was a lot of uncertainty in the program, he was certain in his beliefs in me, us, in the future and the direction,” Capel said. “I think he’s had a really good year. I mean a really good year. I think he’s been a more efficient player. I think he’s grown as a leader. I’ve said this before: I wish his whole experience, his two years here, would have been better. But I think he’s grown, and I think he’s made the best of it.”

Unfortunately, the 6-foot-5 swingman’s best basketball coincided with the start of Pitt’s losing streak. He went scoreless in 10 minutes in Pitt’s victory over then-No. 11 Florida State and his string of eight consecutive games in double-digit scoring started at Syracuse.

Not only did Wilson-Frame become Pitt’s only reliable outside shooting threat, he will go down as one of the top 3-point shooters in school history. Wilson-Frame entered the game ranking second in the ACC in 3-point field goals per game (2.86) and fifth in 3-point percentage (39.0) and holds the school record for 3s per game at 2.57.

After missing his first four shots, all from inside the arc, Wilson-Frame finally drained his first basket on a 3-pointer in front of the Oakland Zoo. Of his 17 shots from the field, he made four and all were treys.

“Well, for us, it’s important to see anybody make a shot because we struggle to shoot,” Capel said. “Jared’s our best shooter, so anytime he can get a good look, we feel good about it. We want him ready to shoot.

“The play that he made at the end of the shot clock was huge.”

Perhaps the biggest when Xavier Johnson found Wilson-Frame deep on the right wing as the shot clock ticked away. As Wilson-Frame’s momentum pulled him toward the Pitt bench, he launched a high-arcing shot that banked off the glass at the buzzer to give Pitt a 38-35 lead at 13 minutes, 54 seconds of the second half.

“I was hoping that I could get it up on the rim so we could get another possession,” Wilson-Frame said. “Once I saw it was going in, though, I just shrugged my shoulders. I’m used to making regular-form 3s. That was kind of a wild, once-in-a-million type of shot. It was fun.”

How huge was it? The Panthers never trailed again. They won by three.

“I did make one like that at Louisville, so it was something that I’d done before and I wasn’t surprised by it,” Wilson-Frame said, “but I was definitely in my head, telling myself that that’s a Senior Day thing to happen.”

But it wasn’t the best thing about Senior Day for Wilson-Frame and the Panthers. By beating Notre Dame, Pitt (13-18, 3-15 ACC) avoided a dubious distinction. A loss would have put them in position for the first back-to-back 20-loss seasons in school history, if you can imagine that.

Wilson-Frame claimed he wasn’t aware of that, focusing instead on being the leader of a team that starts three freshmen and a sophomore and helping change the culture of Pitt basketball. He pointed to the sellouts with the Oakland Zoo student section, to sellouts against ACC powers North Carolina, Duke and Syracuse as positive signs.

“That hasn’t happened in a while,” Wilson-Frame said. “It’s definitely a great feeling to just be able to step onto that court and have Pitt across your chest, see Pitt at half-court and look up into the stands. That’s what you used to see when you were growing up. It’s kind of nostalgic to be actually a part of that, in that jersey. This is just the beginning. I’m glad I got to be here for the start of it.”

Wilson-Frame won’t be here to see it to the end, but he got to put his punctuation on the program in his final game at the Pete with a win that deserved an exclamation point.

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.