Kevin Gorman: Sound the alarms. Steelers looked lost without Antonio Brown |
Kevin Gorman, Columnist

Kevin Gorman: Sound the alarms. Steelers looked lost without Antonio Brown

Kevin Gorman


What we wanted to see more than anything from the Pittsburgh Steelers in their season opener was how their passing game would be affected by the absence of All-Pro wide receiver Antonio Brown.

This debut was a disaster, to put it mildly.

That Brown orchestrated an offseason trade to Oakland and his release from the Raiders only to sign with the New England Patriots on the eve of the opener at Gillette Stadium was of no consequence to Steelers coach Mike Tomlin.

At least, not that he was willing to admit.

“I’m not specifically worried about anything relative to Antonio Brown,” Tomlin said. “I’m worried about the guys in the locker room. The quality of execution of what we did or didn’t do. Antonio’s been off our team for a number of months. We moved on from that stuff in March.”

The guys in the locker room should have the Steelers worried, as there was little quality to their execution. Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger was blunt about taking blame, saying he wasn’t good enough. Wide receiver Donte Moncrief considered it a wake-up call, one that he and the Steelers needed.

The Steelers’ sleepwalking through a 33-3 loss to the Patriots on Sunday night at Gillette Stadium wasn’t just a pathetic performance. This was a pull-the-hotel-fire-alarm type of wake-up call, the kind that should keep the Steelers up all night.

Tomlin said the Steelers weren’t ready for prime time. Not ready? They were playing their AFC arch-rival, the reigning Super Bowl champions, the team that tied their record for most Lombardi trophies and could soon surpass them. How could they overlook the Patriots?

“To come out on Sunday Night Football and play (that way), I guess you could say that,” said JuJu Smith-Schuster, who led the Steelers with six catches for 78 yards. “It’s NFL football and, yes, all eyes are on us, but we’ve got to come out and execute.”

That is as much about lacking proper preparation as it is failing to execute, especially for a team that missed the playoffs, and that starts with Tomlin and his coordinators: Randy Fichtner and Keith Butler. They’ve had since April to get ready for playing Bill Belichick and Tom Brady and the Patriots.

Yet, the Steelers weren’t on the same page from the start. Roethlisberger undershot Johnny Holton on a deep route on a third-and-6 in the Steelers’ first offensive series, and they punted on their first four possessions before a turnover on downs.

The offense was so ineffective the Steelers trailed, 17-0, in the second quarter. Roethlisberger couldn’t find a rhythm and didn’t complete a pass longer than 10 yards until his 19-yarder to Smith-Schuster late in the second quarter. That drive ended at the Patriots’ 47 when Moncrief dropped a pass on fourth-and-1.

“I wasn’t good enough,” said Roethlisberger, who was 27 of 47 for 276 yards with an interception for a 65.6 passer rating.

Neither was Moncrief, who signed a two-year, $9-million free-agent deal this offseason. His 10 targets were the most of any Steelers receiver, but he finished with three catches for 7 yards.

“We just weren’t on the same page at some times, and we’ve got to fix it,” Moncrief said. “It starts with all of us. Nobody points fingers at nobody. It was all of us, everybody that was on the field. …We’ve got to make more plays for 7.”

Roethlisberger reversed that criticism, showing he’s learned from publicly blaming Brown for the Denver debacle last year.

“I’m not worried about him,” Roethlisberger said of Moncrief. “I’m worried about myself. I need to play better. He’ll be just fine. I have all the confidence in the world in him that he’s going to be a guy for us that I can count on. I told him that. I’m not going to shy away from throwing him the ball.”

The Steelers shied away from talking about how bad they were without Brown. They didn’t want to discuss how much they missed him drawing double teams (Smith-Schuster struggled to get open in single coverage against Stephon Gilmore) or catching passes on third downs (they converted only 3 of 12).

The Steelers didn’t want to talk about how Brown regularly rescued them with game-changing catches at Cincinnati, Jacksonville and New Orleans last season alone.

And they most certainly didn’t want to talk about him signing with the Patriots. When asked, Roethlisberger lofted his left arm dismissively and mumbled, “Whatever.”

But Brown cast a shadow over the Steelers, from his absence in their offense to his signing with New England. Brady completed 24 of 36 passes for 341 yards and three touchdowns for a 124.9 passer rating, connecting twice with Phillip Dorsett on scoring passes. Imagine what Brady will do with Brown at his disposal.

We saw what the Steelers looked like without Brown, and it wasn’t pretty.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger reacts on the sideline during the second half against the New England Patriots on Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Mass.
New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady calls signals at the line of scrimmage in the first half an NFL football game against the Pittsburgh Steelers, Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, in Foxborough, Mass.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.